Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14227

Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)

From Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)
Date 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200
Message-ID <EGQrn-9W78-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EEU65-8JLI-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2022-07-03 00 h 49, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400,Boyuan Yang写道:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
>> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
>> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
>>
>> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
>> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
>> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
>> what
>> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
>> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
>> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> 
> As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build-
> dependencies into the NEW queue.
> 
> [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm

Nice!

As I'm sure people will confuse "python3-pdm" (the cli tool) and
"python3-pdm-pep517" (the tool used to build packages), I've created a
Lintian tag:

https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/401

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web