Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14205
| From | Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? |
| Date | 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EDHkB-81Ic-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDjBF-7NuN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, 在 2022-06-28星期二的 13:32 +0000,Stefano Rivera写道: > Hi Boyuan (2022.06.28_13:24:49_+0000) > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there > > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. > > Yes, probably time to package it. > > Bootstrapping shouldn't be problematic, PEP517 includes support for > bootstrapping (backend-path = ["."]), so backends can build themselves > from their own source trees. Thanks. I have uploaded an initial version to the NEW queue. The packaging work is at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/ . It is worth noting that I took the very aggressive way in stripping every vendored libraries, see https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/-/tree/master/debian/patches . This may not be ideal since the patch will need human intervention for every new upstream release, but anyway let's have a working version in Sid first. Meanwhile, any review or other types of help would be appreciated. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200
csiph-web