Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14205

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

From Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
Message-ID <EDHkB-81Ic-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDjBF-7NuN-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

在 2022-06-28星期二的 13:32 +0000,Stefano Rivera写道:
> Hi Boyuan (2022.06.28_13:24:49_+0000)
> > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself.
> 
> Yes, probably time to package it.
> 
> Bootstrapping shouldn't be problematic, PEP517 includes support for
> bootstrapping (backend-path = ["."]), so backends can build themselves
> from their own source trees.

Thanks. I have uploaded an initial version to the NEW queue. The packaging
work is at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/ .

It is worth noting that I took the very aggressive way in stripping every
vendored libraries, see
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/-/tree/master/debian/patches
. This may not be ideal since the patch will need human intervention for every
new upstream release, but anyway let's have a working version in Sid first.
Meanwhile, any review or other types of help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web