Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?UTF-8?Q?Louis-Philippe_V=c3=a9ronneau?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 8 07:13:14 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.19 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 X-Riseup-User-ID: ADC9222C6955525FBCEADBC34BDB3D31A457B509AAA88A6C4646FD9D4AA08BDC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20059 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8b07e996-6637-3ec0-2a98-e54d902c16e6@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 36 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:12:54 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <8b07e996-6637-3ec0-2a98-e54d902c16e6@debian.org> X-Original-References: <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <4ff03efd54183b465cd3a0a3fbf6db60f2b52f66.camel@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14227 On 2022-07-03 00 h 49, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道： >> Hi all, >> >> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build >> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to >> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. >> >> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there >> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be >> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, >> what >> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my >> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just >> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build- > dependencies into the NEW queue. > > [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm Nice! As I'm sure people will confuse "python3-pdm" (the cli tool) and "python3-pdm-pep517" (the tool used to build packages), I've created a Lintian tag: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/401 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄