Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14227

Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)
Date	Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:20:01 +0200
Message-ID	<EGQrn-9W78-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EEU65-8JLI-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 8 07:13:14 2022
Old-Return-Path	<pollo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-6.19 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5
X-Riseup-User-ID	ADC9222C6955525FBCEADBC34BDB3D31A457B509AAA88A6C4646FD9D4AA08BDC
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20059
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8b07e996-6637-3ec0-2a98-e54d902c16e6@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	36
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:12:54 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<8b07e996-6637-3ec0-2a98-e54d902c16e6@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <4ff03efd54183b465cd3a0a3fbf6db60f2b52f66.camel@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14227

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2022-07-03 00 h 49, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道：
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
>> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
>> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
>>
>> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
>> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
>> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
>> what
>> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
>> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
>> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> 
> As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build-
> dependencies into the NEW queue.
> 
> [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm

Nice!

As I'm sure people will confuse "python3-pdm" (the cli tool) and
"python3-pdm-pep517" (the tool used to build packages), I've created a
Lintian tag:

https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/401

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web