Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14227
| From | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) |
| Date | 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EGQrn-9W78-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EEU65-8JLI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2022-07-03 00 h 49, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400,Boyuan Yang写道: >> Hi all, >> >> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build >> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to >> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. >> >> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there >> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be >> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, >> what >> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my >> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just >> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build- > dependencies into the NEW queue. > > [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm Nice! As I'm sure people will confuse "python3-pdm" (the cli tool) and "python3-pdm-pep517" (the tool used to build packages), I've created a Lintian tag: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/401 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200
csiph-web