Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14210
| From | Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) |
| Date | 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EEU65-8JLI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian Project |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi all, 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400,Boyuan Yang写道: > Hi all, > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, > what > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build- dependencies into the NEW queue. [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200
csiph-web