Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14228

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400，Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道：
> > On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> > > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> > > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
> > > 
> > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is
> > > there
> > > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> > > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
> > > what
> > > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> > > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> > > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Boyuan Yang
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517
> > > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517
> > 
> > Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the
> > "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and
> > let people know they can migrate to it.
> 
> This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 .
> 
> Cheers,
> Boyuan Yang

Brilliant!  Thanks for this!  (I think you'll need to do a source-only
upload now to allow migration to testing, unless the procedures have
changed recently.)

Best wishes,

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web