Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #712561
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! |
| Date | 2018-11-12 20:04 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pscmch$39u$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <psbt3b$ga6$2@gioia.aioe.org> <ec882fd9-7a46-493a-ba66-40918b16bbc6@googlegroups.com> <4f5a3a65-add7-436c-8bf5-0257ecfe6e64@googlegroups.com> <pschen$1pmg$2@gioia.aioe.org> <5016e2f3-c509-4720-b89e-63d5d82f73a3@googlegroups.com> |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 8:40:30 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 5:56:28 PM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 2:53:04 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 5:44:49 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 11, 2018 at 10:51:07 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 5:46:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that does not to say that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FOR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E=mc^2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for his photoelectric findings >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his SR!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is as well right !!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==================================> >> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein was only a human being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not an Angle from heaven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ====== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just imagine!! the damage it was causing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along more than 100 years !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by preventing / ''screening'' some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other real >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to speak about PRACTICAL USES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even NASSA by its interstellar projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (to send a human being to Mars!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does no use it!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ordinary Newtonian physics !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eng >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by saying that: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I somehow knew you were incapable of doing a simple Google search, and that >>>>>>>>>>>>> your ONLY recourse is to ask people here for help. Doesn t this embarrass >>>>>>>>>>>>> you a little? >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ========================thank you Bodkin >>>>>>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>>>>>>>>>>> the net >>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>> please note >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites >>>>>>>>>>>> SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> if space is curved >>>>>>>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>>>>>>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>>>>>>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >>>>>>>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It >>>>>>>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >>>>>>>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>>>>>>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>>>>>>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>>>>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >>>>>>>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of >>>>>>>>>>> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. >>>>>>>>>>> The radius of curvature of the earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those >>>>>>>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>>>>>>>>>>> they move in straight lines >>>>>>>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of >>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>> eye to eye system !! >>>>>>>>>>>> not because curved space !! >>>>>>>>>>>> but curved globe >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>>>> I indicated that >>>>>>>>>>>> even according to my understanding >>>>>>>>>>>> SR is right !!! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>>>>>>>>>>> and i understand it >>>>>>>>>>>> but not >>>>>>>>>>>> Gr calculations >>>>>>>>>>>> we have to find out >>>>>>>>>>>> if they use >>>>>>>>>>>> GR calculations >>>>>>>>>>>> or may be >>>>>>>>>>>> just SR calculations >>>>>>>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix >>>>>>>>>>>> Sr >>>>>>>>>>>> with GR ?? >>>>>>>>>>>> we have to ask >>>>>>>>>>>> the real people >>>>>>>>>>>> who did it >>>>>>>>>>>> 'with their hands'' >>>>>>>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>>>>>>>>>>> Sr with GR!?? >>>>>>>>>>>> =================TIA >>>>>>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>>>>>> ============== >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I told you parrot >>>>>>>>>> you and Einstein can plat with your >>>>>>>>>> curves space lines as much as you like and all night >>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> the fact is that prcticslly >>>>>>>>>> GPs is using a thick net of >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> eye to eye (do you understand what is eye tO eye system >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> AMD WHY SO?? >>>>>>>>>> BECUSE IN THAT CASE >>>>>>>>>> A ***STRIGHT LINE PATH*** IS NEEDED !! >>>>>>>>>> GOT IT CURELESS PAERRROT ??? >>>>>>>>>> THAT IS PRACTICE FACTS ?? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It s factually wrong. The system would NOT fail because of the curvature of >>>>>>>>> spacetime for several reasons. >>>>>>>>> 1. It does NOT require straight line of sight the way you think it does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===============================who on earth - tells you that curvature of >>>>>>>> space got to do anything with >>>>>>>> curved space OR CUVED SPACE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> EM WAVES that move is perfect straight lines ARE GOOD ENOUGH TO DO THE 'JOB!!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again, practicality and good enough have nothing to do with validity of >>>>>>> science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ==> > >>>>>>>>> 2. The line of sight >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> I said 'line of site' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> only to indicate that >>>>>>>> that is the reason why a long chain of transmission stations is needed >>>>>>>> to keep contact !!! >>>>>>>> and as anyone know >>>>>>>> em waves move in SRAIGHT LINES !!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But they DONT. That s the point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> THEY ARE RACTICALLY NOT INFLUEBCED BY GRAVITY >>>>>>>> AND THE LITTLE CURVED MOTION >>>>>>>> (if IS ) >>>>>>>> LISTEN CAREFLLY >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> EM VAVES HAVE MASS >>>>>>>> indeed a very small tiny mass >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AND EART HAS AS EVEN YOU KNOW >>>>>>>> HAS A BIG MASS >>>>>>>> SO] >>>>>>>> IT IS ITERACTION BETWEEN >>>>>>>> MASS OF EARTH AND MASS OF EM WAVES !! >>>>>>>> indeed a very small interaction >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> not because of f en curved space !! >>>>>>>> as well as >>>>>>>> Edington at his time >>>>>>>> could not know that >>>>>>>> EM waves HAS MASS!! the only mass !! >>>>>>>> not relativistic mass >>>>>>>> and not schmelativistic mass !!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is relevant between ground and satellite is >>>>>>>>> mostly radial and not tangential, and the bend in the radial direction is >>>>>>>>> negligible. >>>>>>>> ==================negligible because the **tiny mass** of em waves >>>>>>>> NOT F EN CURVED SPACE !!! >>>>>>>> ============== >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3. The bend is so small that it doesn t matter. Remember the radius of >>>>>>>>> curvature of spacetime in the region of the satellites is 31 million >>>>>>>>> billion feet. >>>>>>>> ================you can ''fiddle'' with your f en 'curved line of space >>>>>>>> as much as you like >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (3 billion 10 billon 1000 billion >>>>>>>> any figure you will say >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quantities are critical in science. Physics is a quantitative science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> playing chess with yourself and other useless crocs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =GPS >>>>>>>> -does not use f en curved space >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes it does. It s in the documented design. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NASSA as well does not use it >>>>>>>> no one will ever use it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> only idiots use it >>>>>>>> in their imagination >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> but the bad point of it >>>>>>>> preventing >>>>>>>> real advance !!!! >>>>>>>> and wasting >>>>>>>> precious human resources !!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ============== >>>>>>>>>> NOT nice dream at might !!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>>> indeed the only right thing about yourself >>>>>>>> not your fault >>>>>>>> you was born --A PARROT >>>>>>>> =================the real nice at night dream >>>>>>>> is you and your damaging incurable clan >>>>>>>> of f en curved space >>>>>>>> that BTW has the dimension of **length** only &&!!! >>>>>>>> =================TIA >>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>> ============> >>>>>> ============================DEAR Boddy >>>>>> please tell us about a physical entity >>>>>> >>>>>> THAT DOES NOT HAVE MASS (beside your f en curved space )&&..!! >>>>> >>>>> Sure. A magnetic field 100 million miles from the nearest mass. >>>>> >>>> ================== >>>> (:-) ??? >>>> just tell us >>>> where did you find >>>> such a creature >>>> and how do you know it is 100 million miles from mass?? >>>> 2 >>>> a magnetic field does not have mass ?? >>>> what is it composed of ?? >>>> 3 >>>> an em wave does not have mass ?!! >>>> ==== >>>> TIA >>>> Y.P >>>> >>> ===================== >>> what are the dimensions of a magnetic field ??! >>> >>> ===================== >>> TIA >>> Y.P >>> ============= >>>> >>>> = >>> >>> >> >> It may interest you that the fundamental unit of kilograms is now defined >> in terms of Planck’s constant. > ===================== > > so ??!! > E photon = h f > energy has mass !! No, it does not. I know you’re looking at dimensions again. Bad thing to do. The dimensions of energy also include meters-squared, which are the dimensions of area. Where is the area in energy, Porat?? > ================================================================= > NO MASS - THE ONLY MASS = NO REAL; PHYSICS ! > ================================================== > REMEBER WHO DEFINED/COINED IT THE FIRST ONE !! > SO > YOUR MAGNETIC FEILD > HAS MASS !! >> >> Dimensions do not tell you what a quantity is made of. > ==================== > QHANTITY ?? > > who was talking about quantity of mass > is in magnetic field > al a claimed is that > > thre is no real** physics entity**that has no mass - the only mass ! > > em waves has mass > our globe has mass > that is why em or magnetic waves > are curving next earth > > NOT F EN CURVES SPACE > but that curvature is not enough to curve all around our globe > and that is why we need a long chain of transmission stations > to transmit the G P S around earth > f en curved space has nothing todo with G PS system ! > so > anoher thing(GPS) > > even GPS that don't need curved space > and GPS is another thing that do not use curved spade ! > 2 > NASSA AS WELL DOES NOT NEED IT > > IF SO > WHO THEHELL IS HUSING IT ?? > > AND I WIILL TELL YOU ANOTHER SECRET > (provided you will not disclose that secret to anyone … > > NO AUCH THING AS F EN CURVED SPACE ATALL !! > > > it is all including all forces including gravity is done by ?.... > can you complete that NEW historic sentence/basic rule of physics !! > > discovered by …??? > I am too shy to shy and modest To say it .. > ============= > Y.P > ================================= > > > > > > > > >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > ----------------------------------------------------- > toys indeed!! > ========================== > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 00:37 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 07:19 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:46 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 09:53 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:33 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 12:01 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:38 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 17:12 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 22:08 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:28 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 07:30 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:43 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 11:07 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:09 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:45 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 02:59 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Rick Jones <RJones1993@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:17 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 08:00 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> - 2018-11-03 13:26 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 23:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:51 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-11 16:50 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 03:44 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-11 21:12 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 12:53 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 07:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 08:34 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 10:00 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 18:40 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 11:52 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 20:04 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 16:41 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 01:07 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 22:27 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 22:37 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 01:16 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 12:35 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 06:45 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 16:36 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 08:58 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 01:31 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 23:19 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 18:40 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 19:19 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:33 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 08:42 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-05 14:13 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:39 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 14:56 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 23:40 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:51 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 11:49 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:36 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 02:57 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 17:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:32 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:37 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:43 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 04:57 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 10:21 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 11:28 -0800
csiph-web