Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11023

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From ghisvail@gmail.com
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:10:02 +0200
Message-ID <wJtwu-2hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJtd8-1VM-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 16 09:05:25 2018
Old-Return-Path <ghisvail@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.462 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D62/v5L3cUTD9fRzolpVJvKOxL1XS4oSTu+ngnTtb2M=; b=hMfscZk5nifJku5v/0C/J2IKwWlvWRbEVoMCsmKWzoIoHlGEj2P6rxTKX0ep0DicHh vRxJMvmVZqjP8Pve2E9o8nrnCNbbihsMDfkcd3/frC5iJDErXKsxpStof3nX6mAKW57L G6ok9BFrld9AcjCDyH6lxSEvU0jN/BYi+AAVh+jy8J27O8lYKYljrXf24mlLmcSTEUD6 u5IwdJFf+S/e4ZGSRfMZVGCq/k9igbZMmRCVBe/itkJ/KDXlqTgGESrSjyMTlPo0eyHJ eyYpKCrtqd4ZHG81Dgsd6wFx3QOh2IEYRJSdScWG2msY9TfZAnTYkOeXk5SP5HwKpGFs BDYg==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D62/v5L3cUTD9fRzolpVJvKOxL1XS4oSTu+ngnTtb2M=; b=GrVcbmU1fxaznl+nB/yB4fdailg/9babu8wmwD1wb2oaw18b3eg5Y2R3w29mZD9Lxj Nx/enMQPPw4e374Tw5Qmi69HrArdJcPJ2dylFF9FQ1UlZf6c1Hn2gU9zlzBSCZ3t0Ixa UWJnI8pWsYeMpSkNdtVddRqp+AhsT8+bhzvMBp/IJZ84HVAOzjmznsi1U7QSBEWtOK55 ohi94wGKDyc4AMEKL6ziGr++fpXR64KQR6759da82ey/ep9sml6A255so+0RtfAdX8+m 8auKpBDwrpQuRQ7q0a1eJUnJ07yYnNrxmQqzKSNN8FJzAEVf+8ptATziOtBahvDpUJNw WutA==
X-Gm-Message-State ABuFfohpDk6a71tTKeMN/zMA1ifp2/dd0ddxwed2TA+7C7bRp32GcrVI NRPbQStvfQl1h67si5nHrGs=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ACcGV63C7JkSLay7ckEXmIPe11eCWQvzHj+G1j+AnM+3LZdeV7YtLuIjtHusL5iPCXQ4waTctABD2Q==
X-Received by 2002:adf:fc0b:: with SMTP id i11-v6mr19199380wrr.9.1539680691742; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent Evolution 3.30.1-1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16455
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/84e80f5dee0391ee71e89cabd477533c827ef3a6.camel@gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 41
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:04:50 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <84e80f5dee0391ee71e89cabd477533c827ef3a6.camel@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <47afc535-29be-9a2f-291f-37d790a618ad@uni-rostock.de> <dc3af4878c155095129c0625cd260ea82758da20.camel@gmail.com> <b13d753b-8223-f29b-c7cf-bf6854fa86f8@uni-rostock.de> <a011107a-5302-1897-9165-7f11e7a82bc9@gmx.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11023

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 10:42 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine
> > > learning
> > > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we
> > > might
> > > be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib?
> > The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it 
> > already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't
> > think 
> > that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping
> > an 
> > old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of
> > our 
> > distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2
> > of 
> > matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to
> > find 
> > a way to support two versions for the same distribution.
> 
> Kind of answering myself - I do not see a rush, either. I was just 
> positively surprised about Orange and would like many users to share 
> that experience with Buster - not two years later.

Looking at their release history [1], the upstream release cadence is
once a month.

Assuming the freeze takes about three months to complete (quite
optimisticly), will upstream be interested in feedback and bug reports
from 3 releases ago? Maybe.

What about a year later? That would be 15 releases ago. I am not too
sure about it. They'll just ask you to use Anaconda [2], which is the
very first entry in their installation instructions.

Don't you think?

[1] https://pypi.org/project/Orange3/#history
[2] https://orange.biolab.si/download/

Cheers,
Ghis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
          Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
            Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
              Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200

csiph-web