Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11019

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To <ghisvail@gmail.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 16 08:33:09 2018
Old-Return-Path <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-3.4 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GMAIL=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
Dkim-Signature v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-rostock.de; s=itmz; t=1539677804; bh=k8lgECJT7gFefsbNYtt9cN9oO1yRtt2yg/vhLbMeRRs=; h= "Subject:Subject:From:From:Date:Date:ReplyTo:ReplyTo:Cc:Cc:Message-Id:Message-Id"; a=rsa-sha256; b= RzlLAoydAXCJs9y9xkXCOEkTumX/Fg2gxJqfdSvnENZgVzgiE0TTWV0ULH9EKGtvP7oMr5g8jZ23fvOYU/4ZpxMrgN0Jc4Vkc/xz22ciTCTmIFsz6I/ZQv4x0qUrdlKnNamx/gPLLDgcjktkhiLj8d7muJQV6l9GrKGOBiiXA1Q=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/63.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP [193.147.25.83]
X-Clientproxiedby email1.uni-rostock.de (139.30.22.81) To email1.uni-rostock.de (139.30.22.81)
Content-Transfer-Encoding QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16451
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/b13d753b-8223-f29b-c7cf-bf6854fa86f8@uni-rostock.de
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 42
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:16:42 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <b13d753b-8223-f29b-c7cf-bf6854fa86f8@uni-rostock.de>
X-Original-References <47afc535-29be-9a2f-291f-37d790a618ad@uni-rostock.de> <dc3af4878c155095129c0625cd260ea82758da20.camel@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11019

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Ghis,

On 16.10.18 08:30, ghisvail@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 22:44 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am keeping me busy packaging the Orange machine learning library
>> that
>> seems nice (https://orange.biolab.si/#Orange-Features). Now, the
>> test
>> routines demand a matplotlib.pyplot module that is not in version 2
>> that
>> we feature. Version 3 is the current stable release.
> Ack. Thank you for explaining the context.
>
>> Now, I am tempted to create a package matplotlib3 instead of forcing
>> everyone to update from this long term release (see
>> https://matplotlib.org/).
>>
>> Any opinions from your sides?
> How is that going to work without creating package conflicts?
>
> I suppose  the main module is still named "matplotlib" not
> "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3 would
> be a breach of policy.
Yes. We would need to freely interpret that policy in analogy to Debian 
libraries e.g. for C/C++ or Java.
> Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine learning
> library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we might
> be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib?

The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it 
already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't think 
that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping an 
old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of our 
distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2 of 
matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to find a 
way to support two versions for the same distribution.

Cheers,

Steffen

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
          Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
            Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
              Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200

csiph-web