Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11019
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | <ghisvail@gmail.com> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 16 08:33:09 2018 |
| Old-Return-Path | <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-3.4 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GMAIL=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -6.1 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-rostock.de; s=itmz; t=1539677804; bh=k8lgECJT7gFefsbNYtt9cN9oO1yRtt2yg/vhLbMeRRs=; h= "Subject:Subject:From:From:Date:Date:ReplyTo:ReplyTo:Cc:Cc:Message-Id:Message-Id"; a=rsa-sha256; b= RzlLAoydAXCJs9y9xkXCOEkTumX/Fg2gxJqfdSvnENZgVzgiE0TTWV0ULH9EKGtvP7oMr5g8jZ23fvOYU/4ZpxMrgN0Jc4Vkc/xz22ciTCTmIFsz6I/ZQv4x0qUrdlKnNamx/gPLLDgcjktkhiLj8d7muJQV6l9GrKGOBiiXA1Q= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/63.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Originating-IP | [193.147.25.83] |
| X-Clientproxiedby | email1.uni-rostock.de (139.30.22.81) To email1.uni-rostock.de (139.30.22.81) |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | QUOTED-PRINTABLE |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16451 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/b13d753b-8223-f29b-c7cf-bf6854fa86f8@uni-rostock.de |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 42 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:16:42 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <b13d753b-8223-f29b-c7cf-bf6854fa86f8@uni-rostock.de> |
| X-Original-References | <47afc535-29be-9a2f-291f-37d790a618ad@uni-rostock.de> <dc3af4878c155095129c0625cd260ea82758da20.camel@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11019 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Ghis, On 16.10.18 08:30, ghisvail@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 22:44 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am keeping me busy packaging the Orange machine learning library >> that >> seems nice (https://orange.biolab.si/#Orange-Features). Now, the >> test >> routines demand a matplotlib.pyplot module that is not in version 2 >> that >> we feature. Version 3 is the current stable release. > Ack. Thank you for explaining the context. > >> Now, I am tempted to create a package matplotlib3 instead of forcing >> everyone to update from this long term release (see >> https://matplotlib.org/). >> >> Any opinions from your sides? > How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3 would > be a breach of policy. Yes. We would need to freely interpret that policy in analogy to Debian libraries e.g. for C/C++ or Java. > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine learning > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we might > be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib? The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't think that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping an old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of our distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2 of matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to find a way to support two versions for the same distribution. Cheers, Steffen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web