Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11013

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From ghisvail@gmail.com
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <wJruF-S0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrkZ-OP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 16 06:55:59 2018
Old-Return-Path <ghisvail@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.462 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tWh3Mew2hzUAJgO3keHTGkEUuVE/7bhv33wy0/dgekM=; b=krlFnncnu7w5lqxOs2xQI18WZCePHo6+H6u851w6Y4R0C2i3jENzVqXxpXdZG8VeZP nQBP7QGyIU4bkt99NfTFUoiW382Prp/NPtQKiWp95OjM2MaTzp4/Pbvr8mnh/bmEqopY XuoKHbMFwpS4U+jVSjHX+zspJoMX8zqil1zu4nN2RFm/IALikjlEi4tRp0etXhQHEuUk 8OSvKpnHkbUekdzIZQjnK5nH/2SSMzIftTpSuARseVgEylalMKyWh3UfDVQ36DU8nsvS Cg8NnC1AWyDpAFz6eBWUL811WdXBlt0D12lsCejpmRlK0yxsi73p7kAlGK9jXZjmWXsy nZww==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tWh3Mew2hzUAJgO3keHTGkEUuVE/7bhv33wy0/dgekM=; b=oDW7E4tB/MrqW71Pj6prewQuSZv422QPUB6DOWYTrWMT1qdhj+A7MN06CmldBCk1sB uME4C2QYrJDXR/eym4ts3/6sB++pMlJd8rTzDhEhhSP7FTYfZ0OQlKkcvDrwee3rkRjv tosadlzwSJWhnZhJMV/dXH0oT2mohEoE12cCFs4UV4pel0FsE1+JaWfP0uBTKyU3zg10 HyvGItYOCUvUoDcnEetaaLI6U9Icp3duGSLw7aXR4lSgMFIoo5IynffszaBX4WCsxU2K NV9LgSN4nmW8n45QgxyKzGKP7e6bp29hTmYpmUJKOjKTjHTvsQtLhtniXpdPHbShnqSC CQrg==
X-Gm-Message-State ABuFfoh1Qrd4HKvxbH7KApPj9Ku3nIbX+xWtvmcrDlzyig+Fq1uu3Z1v H6XLvMHvQRiztJNp9hIA7qz/aGwR
X-Google-SMTP-Source ACcGV63gXc4MThPGxKdwLQcnQlC5ZFCH43Pmr6hmaSKPVIpNoNIyjvUyUhyShg0oJoavAH9xiIJmhg==
X-Received by 2002:a5d:540d:: with SMTP id g13-v6mr17187900wrv.4.1539672941852; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent Evolution 3.30.1-1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16445
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/9a951bcf0467588fdd0b64dad002724c61980660.camel@gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 44
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:55:40 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <9a951bcf0467588fdd0b64dad002724c61980660.camel@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <47afc535-29be-9a2f-291f-37d790a618ad@uni-rostock.de> <dc3af4878c155095129c0625cd260ea82758da20.camel@gmail.com> <20181016064615.7nja4gr4wffnf666@an3as.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11013

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 08:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:30:55AM +0100, ghisvail@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Any opinions from your sides?
> > 
> > How is that going to work without creating package conflicts?
> > 
> > I suppose  the main module is still named "matplotlib" not
> > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3
> > would
> > be a breach of policy.
> 
> Probably.

Described in Section 2.2 of the Debian Python policy.

> > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine
> > learning
> > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we
> > might
> > be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib?
> 
> I'm not sure what might be the difference between:
> 
>    3.0.0 Stable version
>    2.2.3 LTS LTS version
> 
> We have some months left until freeze so may be right now it is not
> to
> late to package what upstream considers stable.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.


>From the upstream homepage: "Matplotlib 3.0 is Python 3 only."

Afaik, Python 2 is still considered relevant for the Buster release
cycle. Hence why I am suggesting to wait for the next release cycle
before upgrading key scientific packages, such as matplotlib, to Python
3 only.

Cheers,
Ghis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
          Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
            Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
              Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200

csiph-web