Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2786
| From | BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: EE or CS? |
| Date | 2013-01-10 14:20 -0600 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <kcn7to$ojq$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <Qn4Hs.179$6s2.104@fx14.fr7> <kcjk9h$fdr$1@dont-email.me> <Z6qdnaB20uqP73DNnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <kclgvv$967$1@news.albasani.net> <TqyHs.1392$T67.376@fx05.fr7> |
On 1/10/2013 6:22 AM, BartC wrote: > > > "BGB" <cr88192@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:kclgvv$967$1@news.albasani.net... >> On 1/9/2013 7:35 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >>> On 1/9/2013 3:28 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: > >>> Also, in analyzing C's "quirks" one needs to consider its original >>> purpose and requirements. It was intended to be used as an operating >>> system implementation language. It had to support memory management and >>> allocation, requiring address manipulation. >>> >> >> and, also just so happened to be "just about right" for what much of >> the software industry needed out of a language for about the next 40 >> years. > > I agree that C can do most of the things that are necessary. But so can > assembly code. > > And over 40 years it's accumulated a lot of baggage about which little > can be done because of backwards compatibility. And that includes > compilers with literally thousands of options, make systems and so on. > > Actually for most of that period, I've used my own language for most > situations where anyone else would have used C. While no doubt it has > quirks and problems of it's own, at least its type declarations aren't > so convoluted that I have to employ a third-party application (ie. > Cdecl) to encode and decipher them! > > So my issue with C isn't really what it does, but how. > most people I think don't have much issue with the C declarations. granted, the way they are parsed and interpreted does have the unfortunate side-effect of making compilers slower, but this could be fixed if the language were partly moved to handling declarations more like C# or similar.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EE or CS? bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-01-08 09:28 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-01-08 10:41 -0800
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 21:41 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 20:50 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 22:25 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 21:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 23:23 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 23:31 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 12:58 +1300
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 01:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 02:13 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 11:28 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 12:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 23:52 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:04 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:28 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 18:25 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-09 05:35 -0800
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:43 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:22 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:20 -0600
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:15 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 10:19 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:54 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Robert Miles <robertmilesxyz@gmail.com> - 2013-01-12 16:26 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-19 19:12 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:16 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-20 18:59 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-02-21 16:40 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 07:36 +0000
csiph-web