Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2773
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: EE or CS? |
| Date | 2013-01-09 01:35 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kcihhn$brq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <1xldrs6s8vzev$.olch1fygfhrj$.dlg@40tude.net> <kci3fn$o44$1@dont-email.me> <ct1Hs.9$bn6.1@fx08.fr7> <kci9p6$usl$1@dont-email.me> <X%1Hs.2$9T.0@fx16.fr7> |
BartC wrote: > No, then they might have been considered quite nifty. But they haven't > changed much over forty years and they're carrying a lot of baggage. This is, quite frankly, a load of bullshit. The man was awarded with the Turing Award for implementing Unix, for pete's sake. Do you feel so confident in your judgement to be able to claim that you know better than the entire Association for Computing Machinery? FWIW, Dennis Ritchie's co-author of the original Unix, Ken Thompson, is currently working for Google, developing the Go programming language. Maybe he is eager to be taught a thing or two about programming language design and implementation. > And in the meantime C's syntax has pervaded everywhere, while the > case-insensitive nature of the Unix is still exasperating a lot of people > (even those who don't use it!). Could you point out an example of what you've described as "case-insensitive nature of the Unix"? Rui Maciel
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EE or CS? bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-01-08 09:28 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-01-08 10:41 -0800
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 21:41 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 20:50 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 22:25 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 21:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 23:23 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 23:31 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 12:58 +1300
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 01:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 02:13 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 11:28 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 12:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 23:52 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:04 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:28 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 18:25 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-09 05:35 -0800
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:43 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:22 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:20 -0600
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:15 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 10:19 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:54 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Robert Miles <robertmilesxyz@gmail.com> - 2013-01-12 16:26 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-19 19:12 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:16 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-20 18:59 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-02-21 16:40 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 07:36 +0000
csiph-web