Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2767
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: EE or CS? |
| Date | 2013-01-08 21:35 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kci3fn$o44$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <4f2b11b3-c551-4901-90bb-c4228a89fbd3@googlegroups.com> <ljhh4xtiyo83.aouhg05xzniz$.dlg@40tude.net> <kci0ra$72u$1@dont-email.me> <1xldrs6s8vzev$.olch1fygfhrj$.dlg@40tude.net> |
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > I wasn't very serious. But yes, certainly, K&R C, Unix, TeX are vivid > examples of quite poor software architecture and design. C and Unix > damaged progress in programming languages and OS, no less than MS did, > IMO. Wow. Surely you are, again, not being very serious. Rui Maciel
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EE or CS? bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-01-08 09:28 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-01-08 10:41 -0800
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 21:41 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 20:50 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-08 22:25 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 21:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-08 23:23 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 23:31 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 12:58 +1300
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 01:35 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 02:13 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 11:28 +0000
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-09 12:51 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 23:52 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:04 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:28 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 18:25 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-09 05:35 -0800
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:43 -0600
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 12:22 +0000
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-10 14:20 -0600
Re: EE or CS? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 22:15 -0600
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-09 10:19 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-08 22:54 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Robert Miles <robertmilesxyz@gmail.com> - 2013-01-12 16:26 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-19 19:12 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:16 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2013-02-20 18:59 -0800
Re: EE or CS? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-02-21 16:40 +1300
Re: EE or CS? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0100
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 11:45 +0000
Re: EE or CS? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 07:36 +0000
csiph-web