Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670821

Re: A New Science

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>>>> I invented a New Science.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Take any battery
> > > > >>>>> You have a Plus sign +
> > > > >>>>> You have a Minus sign -
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On which side is the Minus -?
> > > > >>>>> The Left Side or the Right side?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> > > > >>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> > > > >>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> > > > >> flat, but slightly raised
> > > > >> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> > > > >> flower...Positive.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Elevated means Positive
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> especailly above normal level.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 36 C PERFECT
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 28 AA is flat.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> it's about
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Right
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Left.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Good
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Bad
> > > > >>
> > > > >> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> > > > >> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> > > > >> course.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> to the left
> > > > >> it indicates negative emotions;
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > > > >> to the right
> > > > >> it indicates positive ones.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> (to be continued)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The Right side of the brain is...Positive
> > > > >
> > > > > The left side is Negative.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nature agrees with me,
> > > > >
> > > > > That Positive is on the Right and
> > > > >
> > > > > Negative is on the Left.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Angel/Devil
> > > > > Good/Bad
> > > > > Positive/Negative
> > > > > Right/Left
> > > > >
> > > > > +/-
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It agrees with Nature.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you...Right handed?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?
> > > >
> > > > What about the ambidextrous? ;^)
> > >
> > > This is about Positive being on the Right side and
> > >
> > > Negative being on the Left side.
> > >
> > > ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side.
> > >
> > > Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and -
> > >
> > > I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is
> > > negative.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > If you have an angel and a devil on your shoulders...which shoulder is
> > > the devil on???? Right or Left?
> > >
> > > A 3 year old can answer that question correctly by now...
> > >
> > > (not the 'scientific community)
> > >
> > > (to be continued)
> > >
> >
> > When a dog wag's his tail...
> >
> > to the left
> > it indicates negative emotions;
> >
> > When a dog wag's his tail...
> > to the right
> > it indicates positive ones.
> >
> > Nature agrees with Left being negative and
> > Right being positive.
> >
> > Of course 'the scientific community' disagrees with Nature....(with a
> > passion!)
> >
> > There are much more patterens...
> >
> > A baby in Brazil is born with two heads. They usually remove one head...
> > The question the doctors asked was: "If both their brains are
> > functioning, how are we going to choose which head to remove?"
> >
> > The answer is simple! The head on the left side, Right fido?
> >
> > Everyone has a dark side...
> >
> > which side is that? The left side!
> >
> > Now, this New Science can change the world as you know it.
> >
> > For example, when you give a lie detector to someone, which side
> > do you place the sensors????
> >
> > A lie detector manufacture/administrator would answer..."Does it
> > matter????" "Right or Left, what difference does it make?"
> >
> > stupid people today.
> >
> > You know who is doing the lying, right?" The bad guy is lying.
> >
> > The Devil is on the Left shoulder whispering to the left ear..."Kill
> > Him!"
> 
> Now, getting back to the person administrating the Lie Detector
> sensors..
> 
> I would have to advise him that the sensors should be placed on the Left
> side.
> 
> He would ask "Why?"
> 
> Because that is where the Liar is located at, on his Left side.
> 
> He would say, "What do you mean located...on...his..left side??"
> 
> I have to explain it like I'm talking to a 3 year old again..
> 
> You have a Plus sign +
> You have a Minus sign -
> 
> When a dog wag's his tail...
> to the left
> it indicates negative emotions;
> 
> Angel/Devil
> Good/Bad
> Positive/Negative
> Right/Left
> 
> Truth/Lie
> 
> Lie is negative...
> 
> Left brain is negative
> 
> left hand, that is where you place the sensors to
> your stupid lie detector!!!!
> 
> (I don't want to tell him that the entire human body
> on the left side, from head to toe is fully negative charged!)
> 
> You can draw a PERFECT line from head to toe by simply
> following the space/line between the two top front teeth..
> it is the guide to draw a staight line and dividing the human body
> in half.
> 
> (I woudn't be surprised if that is the way human beings were first
> manufactured..
> someone put both halves together.)
> 
> but i don't want to drift away from the golden retrivers attention
> span...

Of fourse, it should go without saying...

that, that which you call the 'soul'/spirt/consciousness is also

divided into Right/soul/positive/good

Left/soul/negative/evil.


The Devil knows which ear to whisper into...the dark side.

PLUS, I have physical evidence of this.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web