Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math

sci.math

332032 articles, 918 threads (numbers 298909 – 645385) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Re: Nobody understands relativity Reginald Giulia <der@geigla.net> 2026-06-09 13:32 +0000
 
Re: Nobody understands relativity Halsey Górski <ybh@tglezkse.pl> 2026-06-09 13:27 +0000
 
Re: Stellar aberration - again (11 replies — unroll) Chadd Babaitsev <sace@iddi.ru> 2026-06-04 12:50 +0000
   → Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-06 09:05 +0200
     → Re: Stellar aberration - again Troyonta Funakoshi <kttr@auso.jp> 2026-06-06 11:08 +0000
       → Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-06 23:38 +0200
         → Re: Stellar aberration - again Abner Ustinovich <ibuvov@sbucn.ru> 2026-06-07 08:23 +0000
           → Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-08 08:54 +0200
             → Re: Stellar aberration - again Newton Grünewald <dznn@ldt.de> 2026-06-08 09:58 +0000
             → Re: Stellar aberration - again Dylan Wyrzyk <wnyl@yzwrr.pl> 2026-06-08 10:13 +0000
               → Re: Stellar aberration - again phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 07:42 -0600
                 → Re: Stellar aberration - again Andreas Amoretto <tossto@trmatad.it> 2026-06-08 15:00 +0000
                 → Re: Stellar aberration - again phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 09:06 -0600
                 → Re: Stellar aberration - again Raymundo Nishikawa <iunm@aiamr.jp> 2026-06-09 13:12 +0000
 
In 2028 BYD sells B100 performant laptop? (Re: Could ISAMORE anti-unification help?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> 2026-06-09 20:13 +0800
 
what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth (22 replies — unroll) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-06-01 08:56 -0700
   → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-06-01 23:28 -0700
     → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-06-02 01:53 -0700
       → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 00:39 -0700
       → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-06-08 00:07 -0700
         → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 06:24 -0600
           → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 08:30 -0700
             → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 08:42 -0700
               → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Brennus <brennus@allia.org> 2026-06-08 20:38 +0000
     → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-02 06:33 -0600
       → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-02 19:55 +0200
         → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-02 12:01 -0600
           → Universe (was: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-02 22:05 +0200
         → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Wesley Kozlowski <yosy@zlowoyo.pl> 2026-06-02 19:13 +0000
           → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-02 22:11 +0200
             → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Jimmy Kamiński <mjmwsimi@ijmay.pl> 2026-06-03 14:38 +0000
               → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-03 21:04 +0200
                 → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 13:22 -0600
                 → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-04 08:21 +0200
                 → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Emmitt Kefalas <mem@skkfeie.gr> 2026-06-03 20:16 +0000
                 → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-06-04 08:31 +0200
                 → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Callum Balabuev <lvmvab@bluumaa.ru> 2026-06-04 11:56 +0000
     → Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-06-02 14:09 -0700
 
Consistent posting isn’t enough. Here’s what actually leads to visibility phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-08 07:40 -0600
 
Re: Nobody understands relativity Auburn Morandi <bia@auuur.it> 2026-06-07 15:39 +0000
 
Re: Nobody understands relativity Inocencio Górski <kkcs@ioncbn.pl> 2026-06-07 14:36 +0000
 
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science (71 replies — unroll) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 10:10 -0700
   → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 10:47 -0700
     → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-07 09:29 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-07 11:08 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 18:32 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-07 19:28 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 07:20 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 12:53 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-09 10:50 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 18:01 -0700
           → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 18:15 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 07:41 +0200
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 23:37 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 00:15 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 14:23 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 06:33 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 07:00 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 19:52 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 17:16 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-11 22:15 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 07:36 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 00:03 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 11:14 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 02:22 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 13:59 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 09:38 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 18:46 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 10:04 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 21:33 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-12 11:31 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-12 10:29 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-13 09:46 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-13 08:38 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 12:59 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 13:06 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-17 08:59 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-17 08:56 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:08 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science x3 <x@x.net> 2026-04-17 15:31 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 17:34 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-18 09:58 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-18 07:29 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-18 01:29 -0700
           → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 13:55 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-20 14:06 -0700
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-20 19:22 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 12:48 -0500
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 20:48 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 08:48 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 07:07 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:17 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:42 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 12:55 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 16:21 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 19:07 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 07:18 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 07:42 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 10:37 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 14:07 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 18:10 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 14:10 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-02 21:46 -0700
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:06 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-07 10:17 -0700
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-25 11:12 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-05 08:44 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-05 08:48 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science squalk <sq@net.invalid> 2026-06-05 19:43 +0100
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-05 12:11 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-06-05 14:55 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-05 20:08 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-06-06 14:38 -0700
 
An afterthought about the Binary Tree (4 replies — unroll) WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> 2026-05-07 22:48 +0200
   → Re: An afterthought about the Binary Tree Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-08 10:58 +0300
     → Re: An afterthought about the Binary Tree Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 10:16 -0700
       → Re: An afterthought about the Binary Tree Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-09 11:02 -0700
   → Re: An afterthought about the Binary Tree Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> 2026-06-06 04:35 +0200
 
[Spam] California: The high-tech society that can't (or won't) count ballots Johnny <johnny@domain.example> 2026-06-05 23:48 +0200
 
ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed (11 replies — unroll) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-30 10:35 -0700
   → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-30 10:36 -0700
     → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-30 10:37 -0700
     → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> 2026-05-30 14:38 -0700
       → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-31 12:55 -0700
     → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 00:22 -0700
       → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 15:02 -0700
         → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 15:04 -0700
   → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> 2026-06-03 08:11 -0500
     → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 07:57 -0700
       → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> 2026-06-03 11:04 -0500
         → Re: ai-just-solved-an-80-year-old-erdos-problem-and-mathematicians-are-amazed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-03 09:52 -0700

~Page 1 of ~1525 (articles 645350–645385) Older →


csiph-web