Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670819

Re: A New Science

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>>>> I invented a New Science.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Take any battery
> > > >>>>> You have a Plus sign +
> > > >>>>> You have a Minus sign -
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On which side is the Minus -?
> > > >>>>> The Left Side or the Right side?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> > > >>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> > > >>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> > > >>
> > > >> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> > > >> flat, but slightly raised
> > > >> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> > > >> flower...Positive.
> > > >>
> > > >> Elevated means Positive
> > > >>
> > > >> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> > > >>
> > > >> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> > > >>
> > > >> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> > > >>
> > > >> especailly above normal level.
> > > >>
> > > >> 36 C PERFECT
> > > >>
> > > >> 28 AA is flat.
> > > >>
> > > >> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> > > >>
> > > >> it's about
> > > >>
> > > >> Right
> > > >>
> > > >> Left.
> > > >>
> > > >> Good
> > > >>
> > > >> Bad
> > > >>
> > > >> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> > > >>
> > > >> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> > > >> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> > > >>
> > > >> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> > > >> course.
> > > >>
> > > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > > >>
> > > >> to the left
> > > >> it indicates negative emotions;
> > > >>
> > > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > > >> to the right
> > > >> it indicates positive ones.
> > > >>
> > > >> (to be continued)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Right side of the brain is...Positive
> > > >
> > > > The left side is Negative.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nature agrees with me,
> > > >
> > > > That Positive is on the Right and
> > > >
> > > > Negative is on the Left.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Angel/Devil
> > > > Good/Bad
> > > > Positive/Negative
> > > > Right/Left
> > > >
> > > > +/-
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It agrees with Nature.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you...Right handed?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?
> > >
> > > What about the ambidextrous? ;^)
> >
> > This is about Positive being on the Right side and
> >
> > Negative being on the Left side.
> >
> > ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side.
> >
> > Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and -
> >
> > I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is
> > negative.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > If you have an angel and a devil on your shoulders...which shoulder is
> > the devil on???? Right or Left?
> >
> > A 3 year old can answer that question correctly by now...
> >
> > (not the 'scientific community)
> >
> > (to be continued)
> >
> 
> When a dog wag's his tail...
> 
> to the left
> it indicates negative emotions;
> 
> When a dog wag's his tail...
> to the right
> it indicates positive ones.
> 
> Nature agrees with Left being negative and
> Right being positive.
> 
> Of course 'the scientific community' disagrees with Nature....(with a
> passion!)
> 
> There are much more patterens...
> 
> A baby in Brazil is born with two heads. They usually remove one head...
> The question the doctors asked was: "If both their brains are
> functioning, how are we going to choose which head to remove?"
> 
> The answer is simple! The head on the left side, Right fido?
> 
> Everyone has a dark side...
> 
> which side is that? The left side!
> 
> Now, this New Science can change the world as you know it.
> 
> For example, when you give a lie detector to someone, which side
> do you place the sensors????
> 
> A lie detector manufacture/administrator would answer..."Does it
> matter????" "Right or Left, what difference does it make?"
> 
> stupid people today.
> 
> You know who is doing the lying, right?" The bad guy is lying.
> 
> The Devil is on the Left shoulder whispering to the left ear..."Kill
> Him!"



Now, getting back to the person administrating the Lie Detector
sensors..


I would have to advise him that the sensors should be placed on the Left
side.

He would ask "Why?"

Because that is where the Liar is located at, on his Left side.

He would say, "What do you mean located...on...his..left side??"

I have to explain it like I'm talking to a 3 year old again..


You have a Plus sign +
You have a Minus sign -

When a dog wag's his tail...
to the left
it indicates negative emotions;

Angel/Devil
Good/Bad
Positive/Negative
Right/Left

Truth/Lie

Lie is negative...

Left brain is negative

left hand, that is where you place the sensors to
your stupid lie detector!!!!

(I don't want to tell him that the entire human body
on the left side, from head to toe is fully negative charged!)


You can draw a PERFECT line from head to toe by simply
following the space/line between the two top front teeth..
it is the guide to draw a staight line and dividing the human body
in half.

(I woudn't be surprised if that is the way human beings were first
manufactured..
someone put both halves together.)

but i don't want to drift away from the golden retrivers attention
span...









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web