Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #736775
| Date | 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? |
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| References | <10clhmh$2uipt$1@dont-email.me> <i3nsek97of5p6uj0ki98rvhdkp25a38qb6@4ax.com> <10clrn0$31pk1$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | bitrex <user@example.net> |
| Message-ID | <68ee8171$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink) |
On 10/14/2025 11:54 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote: >>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:03:12 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> In a reaction to the Dutch government taking control of Xperia: >>> https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch-government-takes-control-of-chinese-owned-chipmaker-nexperia.html >>> >>> China now has issued an export stop of Xperia chips: >>> https://news.bloomberglaw.com/international-trade/china-puts-export-controls-on-nexperia-after-dutch-takeover >>> >>> Which chips and semiconductors does Xperia make?: >>> https://www.nexperia.com/ >>> >>> Are you affected? >> >> We use 6 Nexperia parts, but none are especially unique. Diodes >> mostly, one cmos schmitt trigger. >> >>> >>> Well, we have elections in the Netherlands on October 29, >>> so who knows what the next goverment will do.. >> >> Should be interesting. Things seem to be oscillating rightward lately, >> common-sense, anti-immigration, more oil and gas. > > Yes, and there is a strong anti-Russia jive. > Especially in the EU from it's head Ursula von der Leyen (Von der Lying I say). > She was minister of defense before that in Germany. > It is all about putting money into defense now > Trump wants war in Europe so US can sell more weapons, F35 .. > > >> Wiki says that you have 15 political parties! This parlimentary thing, >> with governments falling, no confidence votes, snap elections, forming >> coalitions, sounds chaotic to me. As it must have sounded to the guys >> who wrote our Constitution. > > Better more parties than 2 always blocking each other? > Or one big one for the people, like in China? > > France also has a problem, Macron does not want to go, wants reforms. > I have made up my mind already what to vote for.. > I do want better relations with Russia. > But will probably a minority vote. > Russofobia is fueled by the current EU head von der Lying. > Few weeks ago she was complaining her flight was delayed by Russians messing with GPS and that the pilots needed charts > Bit strange, as there is radar everywhere here and there > (pilot to airport 'please give me a heading to your airport). > > Unfortunately https://www.flightradar24.com/50.99,-0.31/6 showed it was all bull and the plane kept sending its GPS positiion all the time > it just had a small delay waiting for busy airport traffic. > https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/bulgaria-u-turns-on-claim-moscow-jammed-gps-of-von-der-leyen-s-plane/ar-AA1LShRL > Where will it go? > WW3? > Or will ths USA now just fall apart into different states / countries? > Each state already has widely different laws, it would just mean doing pretty much the same thing except more border security at state lines. What's the point of that. It would just tank the restaurant and tourism industry and make it much harder to traffic cigarettes drugs and liquor around. 70% of the US economy is consumer spending it would just put every state that did that out of business.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000
csiph-web