Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #736777
| From | john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? |
| Date | 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700 |
| Organization | Highland Technology |
| Message-ID | <fd4tekp7140bmuckjerdc2lh4p6pr1vu37@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10clhmh$2uipt$1@dont-email.me> <i3nsek97of5p6uj0ki98rvhdkp25a38qb6@4ax.com> <10clrn0$31pk1$1@dont-email.me> <68ee8171$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:59:29 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >On 10/14/2025 11:54 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: >>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote: >>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:03:12 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In a reaction to the Dutch government taking control of Xperia: >>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch-government-takes-control-of-chinese-owned-chipmaker-nexperia.html >>>> >>>> China now has issued an export stop of Xperia chips: >>>> https://news.bloomberglaw.com/international-trade/china-puts-export-controls-on-nexperia-after-dutch-takeover >>>> >>>> Which chips and semiconductors does Xperia make?: >>>> https://www.nexperia.com/ >>>> >>>> Are you affected? >>> >>> We use 6 Nexperia parts, but none are especially unique. Diodes >>> mostly, one cmos schmitt trigger. >>> >>>> >>>> Well, we have elections in the Netherlands on October 29, >>>> so who knows what the next goverment will do.. >>> >>> Should be interesting. Things seem to be oscillating rightward lately, >>> common-sense, anti-immigration, more oil and gas. >> >> Yes, and there is a strong anti-Russia jive. >> Especially in the EU from it's head Ursula von der Leyen (Von der Lying I say). >> She was minister of defense before that in Germany. >> It is all about putting money into defense now >> Trump wants war in Europe so US can sell more weapons, F35 .. >> >> >>> Wiki says that you have 15 political parties! This parlimentary thing, >>> with governments falling, no confidence votes, snap elections, forming >>> coalitions, sounds chaotic to me. As it must have sounded to the guys >>> who wrote our Constitution. >> >> Better more parties than 2 always blocking each other? >> Or one big one for the people, like in China? >> >> France also has a problem, Macron does not want to go, wants reforms. >> I have made up my mind already what to vote for.. >> I do want better relations with Russia. >> But will probably a minority vote. >> Russofobia is fueled by the current EU head von der Lying. >> Few weeks ago she was complaining her flight was delayed by Russians messing with GPS and that the pilots needed charts >> Bit strange, as there is radar everywhere here and there >> (pilot to airport 'please give me a heading to your airport). >> >> Unfortunately https://www.flightradar24.com/50.99,-0.31/6 showed it was all bull and the plane kept sending its GPS positiion all the time >> it just had a small delay waiting for busy airport traffic. >> https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/bulgaria-u-turns-on-claim-moscow-jammed-gps-of-von-der-leyen-s-plane/ar-AA1LShRL >> Where will it go? >> WW3? >> Or will ths USA now just fall apart into different states / countries? >> > >Each state already has widely different laws, it would just mean doing >pretty much the same thing except more border security at state lines. >What's the point of that. It would just tank the restaurant and tourism >industry and make it much harder to traffic cigarettes drugs and liquor >around. > >70% of the US economy is consumer spending it would just put every state >that did that out of business. Spending is a side effect of prosperity, not a cause. John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000
csiph-web