Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #736932
| From | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? |
| Date | 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10d0kun$201sa$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <10clhmh$2uipt$1@dont-email.me> <10cu5kv$1b2od$1@dont-email.me> |
>Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com>wrote: >>On 10/14/2025 6:03 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> In a reaction to the Dutch government taking control of Xperia: >> https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch-government-takes-control-of-chinese-owned-chipmaker-nexperia.html >> >> China now has issued an export stop of Xperia chips: >> https://news.bloomberglaw.com/international-trade/china-puts-export-controls-on-nexperia-after-dutch-takeover >> >> Which chips and semiconductors does Xperia make?: >> https://www.nexperia.com/ >> >> Are you affected? > >Are Diodes Inc., Vishay Intertechnology Inc., & Infineon the likely beneficiaries of any restriction on Nexperia parts? In the long term maybe. In the short term for example automotive companies will need to redesign for other chips?
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000
csiph-web