Re: More semiconductor trouble coming?

From	"Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: More semiconductor trouble coming?
Date	2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
Organization	BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID	<10d3k4c$1mu3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <ni74fkpsuk5lrph7hkmrgq130c402a7thd@4ax.com> <10ctnal$16k89$1@dont-email.me> <rgo4fkte9bl3htbj3raad6upuuc5t7ghjm@4ax.com> <10ctpbf$178u4$1@dont-email.me> <m9q4fkh14pkmlr8j1igm4pti66gq82e8lp@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:m9q4fkh14pkmlr8j1igm4pti66gq82e8lp@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:02:49 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:28:20 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote:
>>>>>>On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:28:09 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>As to the subject line,
>>>>>>I was reading Germany is now sounding the alarm for its car manufacturing industry
>>>>>>as it uses lots of nexperia chips.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Those German cars made in the US?  Are there any?
>>>>>
>>>>>Google says there are.
>>>>>
>>>>>>, what about chips for those?
>>>>>>I was also reading on my phone that US drivers above 70 years old need more tests like eye test etc to renew their
>>>>>>license...
>>>>>>Can you still drive?
>>>>>
>>>>>A few years ago I had to take a test to renew my drivers license. It
>>>>>wasn't difficult. I scored 100% on the written part and passed the eye
>>>>>test easily. There was no actual driving test.
>>>>>
>>>>>In California, you only need one eye to drive.
>>>>
>>>>I still have a Florida driving license somewhere, but is long expired..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I didn't renew the motorcycle part. I'm over that. It's chilly and
>>>>>dangerous.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, had 2 motorcycles, stopped with that after almost sliding of the road in some sand in a turn.
>>>>Was OK, but indeed more chances of disaster.
>>>>Had a scooter too, Kymco, Chinese, not bad at all.
>>>>Do not need it here, bit shopping on the bike to the next village keeps muscles in form, easier parking too:-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I opened a satellite design center near home and usually walk to work.
>>>>>It's about half a mile each way, but a few hundred vertical feet. Nice
>>>>>walk, mostly on green dirt lanes or though the canyon. I drive on
>>>>>nasty days, and for shopping and skiing and such.
>>>>>
>>>>>Clicking a mouse all day isn't very aerobic, and walking is good for
>>>>>thinking.
>>>>
>>>>I started walking long distances as a kid, my father wanted me to participate in a group.
>>>>Had a box full of medals for completed tracks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Nexperia now has mosfets that are designed for good dynamic current
>>>>>sharing when used in parallel. The transfer curves are very tightly
>>>>>controlled. Laser trimmed or something I guess.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do europeans put the table of contents at the end of a data sheet?
>>>>I dunno, just looked up Philips SAA5281 (used it to add text to my drone head up display).
>>>>No index at all.
>>>>Philips SAA7111 (video input processor) has the overview of contents on the first page
>>>>
>>>>Which chip are you looking at?
>>>
>>>Nexperia PSMN1R9-80SSJ.
>>
>>I see an index on the left in the pdf I just downloaded
>>but the webbrowser (Chromium here) does not display it for some reason.
>
> I downloaded the PDF.  The TOC is last.

Most documents I've ever seen have the contents first and the index last.
No idea why they put the contents last but I rarely put data sheets on paper now.
I can see the contents on the left in Foxit reader and click it as necessary.
Then I can move the document over to my second monitor if I want to refer to it.
Maybe the lowest on resistance I've seen but also the highest input capacitance.

>
> We save pdf data sheets in our materials database.
>
>
> John Larkin
> Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
> Lunatic Fringe Electronics

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
  Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
        Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
        Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
          Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
            Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
              Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
  Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000

csiph-web