Re: More semiconductor trouble coming?

From	Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: More semiconductor trouble coming?
Date	2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<10ctpbf$178u4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <uie3fkptc7p3i9lm72otu33et1e18o7543@4ax.com> <10csr6a$ui34$1@dont-email.me> <ni74fkpsuk5lrph7hkmrgq130c402a7thd@4ax.com> <10ctnal$16k89$1@dont-email.me> <rgo4fkte9bl3htbj3raad6upuuc5t7ghjm@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote:
>>On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:28:20 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:28:09 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>As to the subject line,
>>>>I was reading Germany is now sounding the alarm for its car manufacturing industry
>>>>as it uses lots of nexperia chips.
>>>>
>>>>Those German cars made in the US?  Are there any?
>>>
>>>Google says there are.
>>>
>>>>, what about chips for those?
>>>>I was also reading on my phone that US drivers above 70 years old need more tests like eye test etc to renew their
>>>>license...
>>>>Can you still drive?
>>>
>>>A few years ago I had to take a test to renew my drivers license. It
>>>wasn't difficult. I scored 100% on the written part and passed the eye
>>>test easily. There was no actual driving test.
>>>
>>>In California, you only need one eye to drive.
>>
>>I still have a Florida driving license somewhere, but is long expired..
>>
>>
>>>I didn't renew the motorcycle part. I'm over that. It's chilly and
>>>dangerous.
>>
>>Yes, had 2 motorcycles, stopped with that after almost sliding of the road in some sand in a turn.
>>Was OK, but indeed more chances of disaster.
>>Had a scooter too, Kymco, Chinese, not bad at all.
>>Do not need it here, bit shopping on the bike to the next village keeps muscles in form, easier parking too:-)
>> 
>>
>>>I opened a satellite design center near home and usually walk to work.
>>>It's about half a mile each way, but a few hundred vertical feet. Nice
>>>walk, mostly on green dirt lanes or though the canyon. I drive on
>>>nasty days, and for shopping and skiing and such.
>>>
>>>Clicking a mouse all day isn't very aerobic, and walking is good for
>>>thinking.
>>
>>I started walking long distances as a kid, my father wanted me to participate in a group.
>>Had a box full of medals for completed tracks.
>>
>>
>>>Nexperia now has mosfets that are designed for good dynamic current
>>>sharing when used in parallel. The transfer curves are very tightly
>>>controlled. Laser trimmed or something I guess.
>>>
>>>Why do europeans put the table of contents at the end of a data sheet?
>>I dunno, just looked up Philips SAA5281 (used it to add text to my drone head up display).
>>No index at all.
>>Philips SAA7111 (video input processor) has the overview of contents on the first page
>>
>>Which chip are you looking at?
>
>Nexperia PSMN1R9-80SSJ.

I see an index on the left in the pdf I just downloaded
but the webbrowser (Chromium here) does not display it for some reason.

So if you open this in the webbrowser and save the file, then the  downloaded has the index list on the left.
 https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/data-sheet/PSMN1R9-80SSJ.pdf  
Maybe an html issue?
I have funny things with the cheap small satellite TV boxes I have,
where you would expect to click to the right for the next icon they go left.
Maybe Chinese user oriented?

From:
 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=do+chinese+write+from+right+to+left%3F
Wikipedia
 https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Horizontal_and_vertical_writing_in_East_Asian_scripts
 Horizontal and vertical writing in East Asian scripts - Wikipedia
 The stroke order and stroke direction of Chinese characters,
 Vietnamese chữ Nôm, Korean hangul, and kana all facilitate writing in this manner.
 [why?] In addition, writing in vertical columns from right to left facilitated
 writing with a brush in the right hand while continually unrolling the sheet of paper or scroll with the left

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
  Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
      Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
        Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
        Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
          Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
            Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
              Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
                Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
  Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
    Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000

csiph-web