Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #736801
| From | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? |
| Date | 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10coe7q$3ohto$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <i3nsek97of5p6uj0ki98rvhdkp25a38qb6@4ax.com> <10clrn0$31pk1$1@dont-email.me> <68ee8171$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <10cnj52$3gm10$1@dont-email.me> <82dvek5tmh4vpo2neemksklmg07gs914ta@4ax.com> |
>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote: >>On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:40:16 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >wrote: > >>>bitrex <user@example.net>wrote: >>>>On 10/14/2025 11:54 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: >>>>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:03:12 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In a reaction to the Dutch government taking control of Xperia: >>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch-government-takes-control-of-chinese-owned-chipmaker-nexperia.html >>>>>> >>>>>> China now has issued an export stop of Xperia chips: >>>>>> https://news.bloomberglaw.com/international-trade/china-puts-export-controls-on-nexperia-after-dutch-takeover >>>>>> >>>>>> Which chips and semiconductors does Xperia make?: >>>>>> https://www.nexperia.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you affected? >>>>> >>>>> We use 6 Nexperia parts, but none are especially unique. Diodes >>>>> mostly, one cmos schmitt trigger. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, we have elections in the Netherlands on October 29, >>>>>> so who knows what the next goverment will do.. >>>>> >>>>> Should be interesting. Things seem to be oscillating rightward lately, >>>>> common-sense, anti-immigration, more oil and gas. >>>> >>>> Yes, and there is a strong anti-Russia jive. >>>> Especially in the EU from it's head Ursula von der Leyen (Von der Lying I say). >>>> She was minister of defense before that in Germany. >>>> It is all about putting money into defense now >>>> Trump wants war in Europe so US can sell more weapons, F35 .. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Wiki says that you have 15 political parties! This parlimentary thing, >>>>> with governments falling, no confidence votes, snap elections, forming >>>>> coalitions, sounds chaotic to me. As it must have sounded to the guys >>>>> who wrote our Constitution. >>>> >>>> Better more parties than 2 always blocking each other? >>>> Or one big one for the people, like in China? >>>> >>>> France also has a problem, Macron does not want to go, wants reforms. >>>> I have made up my mind already what to vote for.. >>>> I do want better relations with Russia. >>>> But will probably a minority vote. >>>> Russofobia is fueled by the current EU head von der Lying. >>>> Few weeks ago she was complaining her flight was delayed by Russians messing with GPS and that the pilots needed charts >>>> Bit strange, as there is radar everywhere here and there >>>> (pilot to airport 'please give me a heading to your airport). >>>> >>>> Unfortunately https://www.flightradar24.com/50.99,-0.31/6 showed it was all bull and the plane kept sending its GPS >>>> positiion all the time >>>> it just had a small delay waiting for busy airport traffic. >>>> https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/bulgaria-u-turns-on-claim-moscow-jammed-gps-of-von-der-leyen-s-plane/ar-AA1LShRL >>>> Where will it go? >>>> WW3? >>>> Or will ths USA now just fall apart into different states / countries? >>>> >>> >>>Each state already has widely different laws, it would just mean doing >>>pretty much the same thing except more border security at state lines. >>>What's the point of that. It would just tank the restaurant and tourism >>>industry and make it much harder to traffic cigarettes drugs and liquor >>>around. >>> >>>70% of the US economy is consumer spending it would just put every state >>>that did that out of business. >> >>From a state point of view, Texas with its oil could become really rich selling it :-) >>And it could unite with Mexico for cheaper drugs, :-) >> >>Same sort of reasoning for other states that have useful stuff, say food, tourist places, cattle.. >>No global Mafia boss in a gold plated dark house with extra space for his balls in a new ballroom >>who fires people to get media attention. >>He did not stop the war in Gaza, all buildings were destroyed, no more US bombs needed, >>and now the creep wants the rest of the world to rebuild it for his golfing attempts. >> > >The gazans, and really everybody, would be much better off. Maybe we >can get the Iranians and the Chinese hooked on golf. Cuba would make a >nice golf resort too, with fancy rum drinks. > >The US has astounding resources. One reason we won WWII is because we >have so much oil and some Texans figured out how to make 150 octane >aviation fuel. The Sun Oil refinery in Texas made the Spitfire fuel >that won the Battle of Britain. > >And we fed our troops over twice the calories as our enemies could. > >I read that the Mississippi valley has more miles of navigable >waterways that the rest of the world combined. Napoleon sold it to the >USA specifically to make to make the US into a power to rival England. This morning, in a discussion in an other group about the value of gold vesrus the US dollar I wrote: https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart Richard Milhous Nixon (January 9, 1913 – April 22, 1994) was the 37th president of the United States, >>>>> serving from 1969 until his resignation in 1974. He decoupled the US dollar from the gold standard. Ever since 1970 gold has been rising (US dollar falling) see above graph from 1970 to today.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:03 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 07:38 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-15 02:37 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 11:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 09:29 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-14 15:54 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:52 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-14 11:09 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 07:40 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-15 15:22 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-15 09:06 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-16 16:17 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 07:58 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-17 14:10 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-16 20:40 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 07:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 04:10 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-10-17 14:26 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-17 14:30 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 15:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:35 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:02 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:07 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-17 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 17:10 -0400
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 02:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 09:08 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-16 08:15 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 11:36 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-18 17:31 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 07:48 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:00 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 11:23 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 12:33 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 14:08 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:16 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-10-19 16:37 +0100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-19 16:28 +0000
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 03:40 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-20 17:32 +1100
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 12:32 -0700
Re: More semiconductor trouble coming? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:06 +0000
csiph-web