Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #623644
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. |
| Date | 2023-11-02 08:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <kqh2fkFc75nU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <kq9368Fiau5U1@mid.individual.net> <4c134ebe-9ece-48f5-8e63-2d51d0afbe78n@googlegroups.com> <kqe7s4Fm9tkU1@mid.individual.net> <%9p0N.832708$jff3.637437@fx14.ams4> <kqgvhvFbfdgU1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 02.11.2023 um 07:59 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am 01.11.2023 um 10:50 schrieb Paul B. Andersen: >> Den 01.11.2023 07:03, skrev Thomas Heger: >>> Am 31.10.2023 um 19:07 schrieb RichD: >>>> On October 30, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>> Am 29.10.2023 um 20:17 sc >>>>> Sure, because the 'Fuehrer' was actually not Hitler. >>>>> My assumption was, that Noel Trevenen Huxley posed as 'Fuehrer', while >>>>> the Brits faked his suicide (to make his disapperance plausible). >>>> >>>> Look at: >>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1579629/Did-Adolf-Hitler-draw-Disney-characters.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Any fan of the Seven Dwarfs can't be wholly bad - >>>> >>>> PS Was Walt Disney maybe part of the conspiracy? >>>> >>> Possibly. >>> >>> >>> Look at this picture again: >>> >>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Hitler%2C_Maurice%2C_Kriebel%2C_Hess%2C_Weber%2C_prison_de_Landsberg_en_1924.jpg/786px-Hitler%2C_Maurice%2C_Kriebel%2C_Hess%2C_Weber%2C_prison_de_Landsberg_en_1924.jpg >>> >>> >>> >>> In the lower left corner we can see a rectangular object, which covers >>> parts of Hitler's right leg and parts of the table cloth. >>> >>> As we can safely assume, that Hitler had a right leg, this something >>> does in fact cover the sight to that leg, which is therefore only >>> partially visible. >>> >>> What we do see instead is a shadowy female left hand, which hovers >>> over/in front of that object. >>> >>> For this observation exists an explanation, which could possibly >>> involve Disney studios. >>> >>> (I don't mean, that Disney was involved, but that such a possiblity >>> would exist) >>> >>> My explanation for this rectangular object goes like this: >>> >>> If this photo was in fact a montage, we need to skip back in time to >>> that era. >>> >>> This picture was made in 1923 (or nearby) and is therefor almost >>> exactly 100 years old. >>> >>> The technology used in photomontage didn't use Photoshop(TM) or >>> similar, because that era was long before the advent of computers. >>> >>> Instead 'photoshopping' was done in real: cutouts, spray-painting, >>> razor erasing and so forth. >>> >>> And if you liked to cover a piece of a picture with unwanted details, >>> you need to paint something directly on it or on an extra sheet of >>> paper, which is possibly a photo itself. >>> >>> This sheet was placed upon an underlying picture and the entire >>> montage was reproduced with a large specialised camera by a >>> specialised and skilled operator. >>> >>> Now this woman (to which the shaddowy arm and hand belonged), was >>> apparently small and untrained, but opperated a professional machine, >>> like those used in animation studios. >>> >>> As she wanted to release the shutter of that reproduction camera, she >>> placed her left hand on that cover sheet and pushed it, >>> unintentionally, a little upwards, because she was leaning on her left >>> hand, while adjusting the focus and releasing the shutter. >>> >>> (This would only be an assumption, but is consistent with the >>> evidence, which is this particular photo.) >>> >>> From the size of the hand we can draw a conclusion about the size of >>> the used machine, which had to be table-sized and belonged to the >>> professional realm, that was used in animation studios. >>> >>> But apparently the makers of this picture were not skilled enough to >>> keep their hand away from that table, were the montage rested while >>> being photographed. >>> >>> So a female hand is vilible on a photograph from Landsberg prison >>> (where it should not belong), which is also held in a very akward >>> angle, supposed the person would sit in front of this set of people. >>> >>> But the angle would be consistent with a person leaning on a table >>> with a montage, while doing something with the right hand (like e.g. >>> releasing the shutter). >>> >>> >>> TH >>> >> >> Can you see the colour of the woman's eyes? >> Her ethnicity is important! >> > > No, not really, because that era didn't have color photography. > > The picture in question is therefore only black and white. > > The detail under consideration (something in the lower left corner) > didn't contain the eyes, neither. > > So, no colors of any eyes are visible in this piece of evidence. > > Ethnicity of that person isn't of any importance here, thou possibly > interesting. > > We need to skip these questions therefore, because the photos cannot > answer them. > > But what we can actually do is this: ask ourself the question, how this > hand came into the picture and what was actually depicted. > > Other assumptions are certainly also possible. > > E.g. the hand could have belonged to a waitress, who brought a tray with > beaverages or a skript girl, who was holding a book. > > Actually I don't know. > > Eventually the girl with the make-up had her fingers in the picture. > > But female hands with a script or a waitress with drinks do not really > belong to a prison for male inmates, anyhow. > > I personally like the idea with a montage, because Hitler and his > comrades had no (or twisted) necks. > > So my own bet would be, that an untrained (young and female) user of a > professional repro-camera forgot to remove the left hand from the > montage-table, while taking a reproduction picture. > > But that is only a guess. > I found another detail, which would raise doubts about this picture: The person on the right of the picture smoked and wore a wedding ring. (As far as I know, rings were taken away from inmates, when they entered a prison). That person looks also very unconvincing, because the head does not fit to the body in size and direction of view. Also these Bavarian socks, a leather trouser and a 'Janker' (traditional Bavarian jacket) do not really fit to a prison. Hess was sitting on something unknown. That could be a bar stool or possibly on the knees of the fat man to the right. Over all, the picture looks like a collage, that was made by free-time artists or a group of students in a course called 'creativity training'. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-21 06:48 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-21 10:55 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-10-21 12:53 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-21 20:50 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:18 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-22 10:38 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-22 08:45 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-22 18:18 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-23 15:33 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 08:36 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 08:05 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-23 08:36 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 09:37 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-24 09:04 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Hilton Babloev <ovlb@lnltoltl.ot> - 2023-10-24 12:09 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-24 18:44 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 15:32 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-25 14:49 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-26 07:40 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-26 07:31 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-27 11:58 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 07:09 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-28 07:38 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-28 09:13 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-29 08:46 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-10-29 15:17 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-29 22:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-30 08:25 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 01:03 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-03 08:53 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 11:50 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 07:48 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-05 10:52 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-30 08:12 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-31 07:50 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-31 08:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-31 11:07 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-01 07:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-11-01 10:50 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Aldo Gorbunov Posadov <svog@lgoavuod.bs> - 2023-11-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-02 07:59 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-02 08:49 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 01:06 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-03 08:45 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 12:07 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-03 18:07 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-04 08:41 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Phong Abulmambetoff <buhm@fehumhof.ma> - 2023-11-04 09:41 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 07:38 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Kyl Babadzhan <zbah@dblankly.ka> - 2023-11-05 13:19 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Meredith Vyskrebtsov <yses@veshrmhe.hv> - 2023-11-05 13:33 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 08:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-05 10:41 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-06 09:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-06 15:09 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-07 08:44 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-07 09:11 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-08 07:43 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 08:45 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:42 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-09 13:19 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 11:35 -0800
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-10 09:08 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-12 01:16 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-12 14:13 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Randolph Tchekomasov <ndop@trsehaho.co> - 2023-11-07 11:23 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-08 07:42 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Stanton Behoev <nteo@htnbbhhn.et> - 2023-11-08 11:49 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:47 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 18:08 -0600
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-08 02:48 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:56 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-31 10:43 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:09 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:28 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Humberto Babakhanoff <khub@ofahorak.hu> - 2023-10-22 12:52 +0000
csiph-web