Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #623510
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. |
| Date | 2023-10-29 08:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <kq6gq6Fu162U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <kpuc9tFt6b3U1@mid.individual.net> <c3ca0c19-fd02-4fbb-9a47-5280d65aa032n@googlegroups.com> <1qj8c9z.14x0olv5al44zN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <kq3kulFb8sgU1@mid.individual.net> <kq3qkbFcbirU1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 28.10.2023 um 09:13 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden: > On 2023-10-28 05:38:49 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > >> Am 27.10.2023 um 11:58 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >>> Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 10:38:10?PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That makes total sense to me, >>>> >>>> >>>> All along, I thought that you (and RichD) are JUST a couple of pathetic >>>> imbeciles. Now, I realize that you are plain insane. >>> >>> TH's theory posted here some time ago >>> that 'Mein Kampf' was really written by an Englishman >>> (one of the Huxleys) in English, >>> and that Hitler's version was a poor translation >>> wasn't enough to tip you off? >>> >> >> No, that was not my theory! >> >> >> My theory was, that the German version was a relatively poor >> translation from a text, which was origionally written in English. > > How is that different from what Jan said? > >> This conclusion came from a side-by-side comparison of the four >> English versions and the German version. >> >> Because I am a nativ speaker of German and speak English quite well >> (as a second language) I could find subtle inconsitencies in the >> translations, which only make sense, if one of the four English >> versions would be the actual original. > > Examples? Am 28.10.2023 um 09:13 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:> On 2023-10-28 05:38:49 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > >> Am 27.10.2023 um 11:58 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >>> Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 10:38:10?PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That makes total sense to me, >>>> >>>> >>>> All along, I thought that you (and RichD) are JUST a couple of pathetic >>>> imbeciles. Now, I realize that you are plain insane. >>> >>> TH's theory posted here some time ago >>> that 'Mein Kampf' was really written by an Englishman >>> (one of the Huxleys) in English, >>> and that Hitler's version was a poor translation >>> wasn't enough to tip you off? >>> >> >> No, that was not my theory! >> >> >> My theory was, that the German version was a relatively poor >> translation from a text, which was origionally written in English. > > How is that different from what Jan said? > >> This conclusion came from a side-by-side comparison of the four >> English versions and the German version. >> >> Because I am a nativ speaker of German and speak English quite well >> (as a second language) I could find subtle inconsitencies in the >> translations, which only make sense, if one of the four English >> versions would be the actual original. > > Examples? This comparison is difficult and annying, but let me do it once more just for you: (This is a random pick. but you could see the same pattern at all over the place). --------------------------------------------------- Vol II, Chapter I, German edition Jeden Morgen begibt sich der Herr Volksvertreter in das Hohe Haus, und wenn schon nicht ganz hinein, so doch wenigstens bis in den Vorraum, in dem die Anwesenheitslisten auf liegen. Im angreifenden Dienste für das Volk trägt er dort seinen Namen ein und nimmt als wohlverdienten Lohn eine kleine Entschädigung für diese fortgesetzten zermürbenden Anstrengungen entgegen. Vol II, Chapter I, Page 268 Notide edition Morning after morning the honourable deputy wends his way to the House, and though he may not enter the Chamber itself he gets at least as far as the front hall, where he will find the register on which the names of the deputies in attendance have to be inscribed. As a part of his onerous service to his constituents he enters his name, and in return receives a small indemnity as a well-earned reward for his unceasing and exhausting labours. Paternoster Library edition page 147 Once the Elections are over the Member-who is elected for five years - goes each morning to the House, not perhaps right inside, but at any rate as far as the hall in which the attendance lists are placed. His fatiguing service in the people’s cause leads him to sign his name, and in return for this exhausting effort, daily repeated, he accepts a small honorarium as his well-earned reward. --------------------------------------------------------------- First: this describes a procedure unknown in Austria, but in the House of Commons in England. Second:. the paternoster library inserted ‚...elected for five years’, which wasn’t present in the German version. Third: the German word ‚angreifend’ is ‚twisted’ and very bad German. Better would have been ‚erschöpfend’ (as kind of ironic statement about the ‚exhausting’ work). fourth: 'diese fortgesetzten zermürbenden Anstrengungen' misses an 'und' or a comma. This is a rule in German, that a list of equally ranked items need either 'und' (and) or a comma. But this is the case because 'fortgesetzten' (continously) is not a qualifier to 'zermürbenden' (exhausting). That would be 'fortgesetzt' (repeatedly). The German sentence is actually twisted and also gramatically wrong. To translate the Geramn sentence is difficult, but would mean something like 'crunched repeatedly by efforts'. and so forth.... -------------------------------------------------------------------- Now it would not make sense to alter the German version in the sense of 'to beautify' it, because Germany was at that time the enemy in a way and the author the leader of that enemy. So, it would not make much sense, if a translation attempted to make the origional version better than it actuially was (better: wasn't). This enables to take the best (in the sense of liguistic qualities) version as source, which was the one of Paternoster Library, and the worst as translation (which was the German one - by far!). TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-17 08:50 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-17 11:31 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-18 07:53 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-18 10:53 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-10-18 02:34 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-19 10:29 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-19 12:04 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-21 06:48 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-21 10:55 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-10-21 12:53 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-21 20:50 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:18 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-22 10:38 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-22 08:45 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-22 18:18 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-23 15:33 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 08:36 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 08:05 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-23 08:36 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 09:37 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-24 09:04 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Hilton Babloev <ovlb@lnltoltl.ot> - 2023-10-24 12:09 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-24 18:44 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 15:32 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-25 14:49 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-26 07:40 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-26 07:31 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-27 11:58 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 07:09 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-28 07:38 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-28 09:13 +0200
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-29 08:46 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-10-29 15:17 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-10-29 22:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-30 08:25 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 01:03 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-03 08:53 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 11:50 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 07:48 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-05 10:52 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-30 08:12 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-31 07:50 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-10-31 08:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-31 11:07 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-01 07:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-11-01 10:50 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Aldo Gorbunov Posadov <svog@lgoavuod.bs> - 2023-11-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-02 07:59 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-02 08:49 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 01:06 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-03 08:45 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-03 12:07 -0400
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-03 18:07 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-04 08:41 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Phong Abulmambetoff <buhm@fehumhof.ma> - 2023-11-04 09:41 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 07:38 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Kyl Babadzhan <zbah@dblankly.ka> - 2023-11-05 13:19 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Meredith Vyskrebtsov <yses@veshrmhe.hv> - 2023-11-05 13:33 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-05 08:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-05 10:41 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-06 09:03 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-06 15:09 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-07 08:44 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-07 09:11 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-08 07:43 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 08:45 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:42 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-09 13:19 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 11:35 -0800
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-10 09:08 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-12 01:16 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-12 14:13 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Randolph Tchekomasov <ndop@trsehaho.co> - 2023-11-07 11:23 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-08 07:42 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Stanton Behoev <nteo@htnbbhhn.et> - 2023-11-08 11:49 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:47 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 18:08 -0600
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-08 02:48 -0500
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-09 07:56 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-10-31 10:43 +0100
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:09 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-10-21 17:28 -0700
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Humberto Babakhanoff <khub@ofahorak.hu> - 2023-10-22 12:52 +0000
Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before. Daryll Shahtmeister <ihsa@eidssrii.hs> - 2023-10-18 11:50 +0000
csiph-web