Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
714 articles, 225 threads (numbers 76 – 789) — flat view
| Advanced| Subject | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support (6 replies) | Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> | 2016-01-05 13:16 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> | 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> | 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> | 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> | 2016-02-20 15:18 -0600 |
| → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> | 2016-04-01 19:07 -0600 |
| Amend request (throwing error) | WIJ <wij@totalbb.net.tw> | 2016-03-18 13:13 -0600 |
| C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs (2 replies) | Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de> | 2016-02-20 15:19 -0600 |
| → Re: C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs | Christof Meerwald <NOSPAM-seeMySig+ul15+@usenet.cmeerw.org> | 2016-03-16 01:07 -0600 |
| → Re: C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs | Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de> | 2016-03-16 01:07 -0600 |
| Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes | W Karas <wkaras@this.is.invalid> | 2016-03-16 01:05 -0600 |
| Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type. | Edward Rosten <firstname.dot.lastname@googlemail.com> | 2016-03-16 01:06 -0600 |
| Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies (1 reply) | Jonathan Jones <jhjones1969@googlemail.com> | 2015-09-12 11:24 -0600 |
| → Re: Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> | 2015-09-13 07:51 -0600 |
| Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? (7 replies) | Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> | 2015-07-27 11:22 -0600 |
| → Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> | 2015-07-30 11:54 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> | 2015-08-01 21:09 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> | 2015-08-16 17:29 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-08-18 22:35 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> | 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600 |
| → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? | Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> | 2015-08-21 19:14 -0600 |
| Unicode support in C++ 17 (1 reply) | stg <mail@glenstark.net> | 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600 |
| → Re: Unicode support in C++ 17 | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-08-14 13:33 -0600 |
| Re: Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments | vervaeck.sam@googlemail.com | 2015-07-30 13:12 -0600 |
| Conflicting extern variable declarations | Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0@googlemail.com> | 2015-07-15 13:55 -0600 |
| How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit" (1 reply) | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> | 2015-06-28 15:17 -0600 |
| → Re: How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit" | Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> | 2015-06-29 13:29 -0600 |
| Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads (2 replies) | itaj sherman <itajsherman@googlemail.com> | 2015-06-22 14:22 -0600 |
| → Re: Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads | via.usov@googlemail.com | 2015-06-25 14:32 -0600 |
| → Re: Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads | itaj sherman <itajsherman@googlemail.com> | 2015-06-26 01:29 -0600 |
| tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators (1 reply) | Arno Schoedl <arnoschoedl@googlemail.com> | 2015-05-19 01:59 -0600 |
| → Re: tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators | Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> | 2015-05-21 21:09 -0600 |
| Macro replacement interpretation (12 replies) | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2015-03-26 12:09 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2015-03-27 14:07 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-03-29 03:01 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2015-03-30 12:20 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2015-03-30 12:21 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2015-03-31 15:39 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2015-04-01 16:39 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2015-03-31 15:38 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-04-01 16:38 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2015-04-02 13:24 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2015-04-03 14:30 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2015-04-03 14:30 -0600 |
| → Re: Macro replacement interpretation | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2015-04-04 15:50 -0600 |
| object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation (2 replies) | via.usov@googlemail.com | 2015-02-28 14:59 -0600 |
| → Re: object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation | Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> | 2015-03-26 12:09 -0600 |
| → Re: object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation | via.usov@googlemail.com | 2015-03-30 12:21 -0600 |
| Re: Moving local objects into lambda closure | avi.kivity@googlemail.com | 2015-02-04 13:15 -0600 |
| constexpr parameters | Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@noemail.com> | 2014-10-22 01:06 -0600 |
| Destructive erase for associative containers (1 reply) | travis@gockelhut.com | 2014-10-10 14:51 -0600 |
| → Re: Destructive erase for associative containers | Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> | 2014-10-15 13:27 -0600 |
| N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member (8 replies) | rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com | 2014-08-30 13:29 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> | 2014-09-16 21:01 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | Philip Guenther <guenther@googlemail.com> | 2014-09-17 19:29 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> | 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> | 2014-09-20 01:37 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> | 2014-09-23 14:52 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> | 2014-09-24 16:30 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600 |
| → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member | Francis Glassborow <Francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600 |
| alignment with ISO C11 | Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> | 2014-08-27 12:27 -0600 |
| Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? (5 replies) | Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> | 2014-05-30 15:32 -0600 |
| → Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? | SG <s.gesemann@googlemail.com> | 2014-06-05 12:31 -0600 |
| → Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? | Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi> | 2014-06-07 01:25 -0600 |
| → Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? | Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> | 2014-06-07 02:33 -0600 |
| → Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2014-06-08 01:32 -0600 |
| → Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal? | Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> | 2014-06-17 07:25 -0600 |
| Reinterpret casting to array types | jeremybms@googlemail.com | 2014-06-15 10:05 -0600 |
| can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly? | john.salmon@googlemail.com | 2014-05-30 15:33 -0600 |
| Compile-time integer sequences C++14 (1 reply) | Piet <bremende55@googlemail.com> | 2014-05-13 13:52 -0600 |
| → Re: Compile-time integer sequences C++14 | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2014-05-14 21:19 -0600 |
| Semantics of std::function's constructors (1 reply) | Roman Perepelitsa <Roman.Perepelitsa@googlemail.com> | 2014-03-19 23:13 -0700 |
| → Re: Semantics of std::function's constructors | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2014-03-21 13:11 -0700 |
| Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in (1 reply) | Peter <pilarp@poczta.onet.pl> | 2014-03-12 14:30 -0700 |
| → Re: Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in | enoquick <enoquick@googlemail.com> | 2014-03-14 12:23 -0600 |
| Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers] (1 reply) | mjbshaw@googlemail.com | 2014-03-11 08:17 -0700 |
| → Re: Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers] | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2014-03-12 14:29 -0700 |
| Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity? (1 reply) | goodbyeera@googlemail.com | 2014-03-10 01:15 -0600 |
| → Re: Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity? | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2014-03-11 08:16 -0700 |
| RE: The behavior of streambuf::seekoff (3 replies) | Nach <nachman+compgroups@nissuin.org> | 2014-02-14 10:41 -0800 |
| → Re: The behavior of streambuf::seekoff | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2014-02-18 14:36 -0800 |
| → Re: The behavior of streambuf::seekoff | nachman@nissuin.org | 2014-02-19 19:41 -0800 |
| → Re: The behavior of streambuf::seekoff | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2014-02-19 19:41 -0800 |
| overload resolution failed (2 replies) | Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> | 2013-08-05 00:20 -0600 |
| → Re: overload resolution failed | Bart van Ingen Schenau <bart@ingen.ddns.info.invalid> | 2013-08-06 01:51 -0600 |
| → Re: overload resolution failed | Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> | 2014-01-06 12:36 -0800 |
| Is a union a kind of class? (7 replies) | Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> | 2013-08-31 01:12 -0600 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2013-08-31 23:52 -0700 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-08-31 23:52 -0700 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | johnolithicsoftware@googlemail.com | 2013-12-19 11:24 -0800 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | "news" <news@fx21.iad.highwinds-media.com> | 2013-12-22 19:27 -0600 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-12-27 13:11 -0600 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | evansl <cppljevans@googlemail.com> | 2013-12-29 23:00 -0600 |
| → Re: Is a union a kind of class? | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-12-31 17:45 -0600 |
| proposal: new bitfield value to ensure structure packing (4 replies) | danielgutson@googlemail.com | 2013-11-22 09:04 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal: new bitfield value to ensure structure packing | ootiib@hot.ee | 2013-11-25 08:44 -0800 |
| → Re: proposal: new bitfield value to ensure structure packing | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-11-25 16:09 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal: new bitfield value to ensure structure packing | danielgutson@googlemail.com | 2013-11-26 17:19 -0800 |
| → Re: proposal: new bitfield value to ensure structure packing | danielgutson@googlemail.com | 2013-11-26 17:19 -0800 |
| flow-control operators overloading for "statement templates" aiding a generic solution for parallel technologies a program transformations | danielgutson@googlemail.com | 2013-11-22 09:05 -0600 |
| Throwing in a constexpr function in C++14 (1 reply) | s.scott.schurr@googlemail.com | 2013-10-18 01:07 -0600 |
| → Re: Throwing in a constexpr function in C++14 | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2013-10-19 11:04 -0700 |
| Re: proposal : keyword default (15 replies) | alexander.stoyan@googlemail.com | 2013-10-03 13:25 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2013-10-04 11:19 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com> | 2013-10-04 11:58 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> | 2013-10-05 19:19 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-10-07 01:50 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-10-05 19:19 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> | 2013-10-07 01:50 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-10-07 15:05 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-10-08 12:36 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> | 2013-10-12 03:47 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-10-12 11:36 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | ootiib@hot.ee | 2013-10-12 23:10 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> | 2013-10-13 11:33 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-10-16 10:34 -0600 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> | 2013-10-14 20:37 -0700 |
| → Re: proposal : keyword default | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2013-10-18 01:20 -0600 |
| Calling conventions in the C++ standard (3 replies) | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> | 2013-09-30 19:05 -0600 |
| → Re: Calling conventions in the C++ standard | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2013-10-01 19:16 -0600 |
| → Re: Calling conventions in the C++ standard | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2013-10-01 19:15 -0600 |
| → Re: Calling conventions in the C++ standard | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> | 2013-10-10 18:10 -0700 |
| Re: Template explicit specialization (2 replies) | Francesco <xtrigger303@gmail.com> | 2011-01-29 10:02 -0600 |
| → Re: Template explicit specialization | Francesco <xtrigger303@gmail.com> | 2011-01-30 16:29 -0600 |
| → Re: Template explicit specialization | Bart van Ingen Schenau <bart@ingen.ddns.info> | 2011-01-30 16:28 -0600 |
| Template explicit specialization (2 replies) | Francesco <xtrigger303@gmail.com> | 2011-01-28 01:07 -0600 |
| → Re: Template explicit specialization | CornedBee <wasti.redl@gmx.net> | 2011-01-28 10:14 -0600 |
| → Re: Template explicit specialization | "Johannes Schaub (litb)" <schaub-johannes@web.de> | 2011-01-29 10:00 -0600 |
| shared_ptr inner workings. Are conversions customizable? | german diago <germandiago@gmail.com> | 2011-02-06 19:09 -0600 |
| Re: std::max returning the first argument when the arguments are equivalent | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> | 2011-01-28 01:07 -0600 |
| this pointer question. Strange behaviour? (1 reply) | german diago <germandiago@gmail.com> | 2011-02-10 07:24 -0600 |
| → Re: this pointer question. Strange behaviour? | Suncho <stupid@fake.email> | 2011-02-10 10:30 -0600 |
| Re: shared_ptr inner workings. Are conversions customizable? | =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=3DFCgler?=3D <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.c=.om> | 2011-02-09 01:59 -0600 |
| [CfP] Reminder: 5th Annual BoostCon, Aspen (CO, USA), May 15-20, 2011 | hkaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> | 2011-01-30 16:28 -0600 |
| Re: Defect Report #1116: Comment about changes | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-02-09 01:58 -0600 |
| Re: Defect Report #1116: Comment about changes | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-02-06 19:09 -0600 |
| Standard Proposal For New-Style Iterators | Adam Badura <abadura@o2.pl> | 2011-02-11 20:13 -0600 |
| 2013-09 pre-Chicago mailing available + core and Library issues lists | Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@keldix.com> | 2013-09-11 13:19 -0600 |
| Re: Why not operator. overloading? (1 reply) | sirisian@googlemail.com | 2013-04-12 14:04 -0700 |
| → Re: Why not operator. overloading? | Daryle Walker <darylew@googlemail.com> | 2013-08-17 02:13 -0600 |
| Why check for narrowing? Why is there no type-trait for narrowing conversions? (1 reply) | Daryle Walker <darylew@googlemail.com> | 2013-08-06 01:52 -0600 |
| → Re: Why check for narrowing? Why is there no type-trait for narrowing conversions? | "Nevin \":-]\" Liber" <nevin@eviloverlord.com> | 2013-08-07 13:38 -0600 |
| semantics of multithreading? (7 replies) | siegebell@googlemail.com | 2013-06-10 12:23 -0700 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | Jason McKesson <jmckesson@googlemail.com> | 2013-06-11 12:19 -0700 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> | 2013-06-13 08:42 -0700 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | siegebell@googlemail.com | 2013-06-15 08:42 -0600 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | Jason McKesson <jmckesson@googlemail.com> | 2013-06-16 19:58 -0600 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | usenet@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de (Michael Karcher) | 2013-06-18 11:36 -0700 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | siegebell@googlemail.com | 2013-06-23 19:19 -0600 |
| → Re: semantics of multithreading? | siegebell@googlemail.com | 2013-06-23 19:18 -0600 |
~Page 1 of ~5 (articles 645–789) Older →
csiph-web