Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| Message-ID | <d3ituoF60v2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> |
| Subject | Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? |
| Organization | unknown |
| References | <820594f6-b670-4dba-8254-26d352489616@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600 |
On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes Gerd Becker wrote: Currently, you cannot rely on ADL within a class defining a member > function of the same name as the function you would like to be called. > I must admit that my C++ is getting a bit rusty, but this "problem" was well-known a decade ago, typically manifesting with std::swap and member functions of the name. The solution then was equally well known, and continues to work in C++11/14: using std::begin; auto i = begin(c); Richard -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-27 11:22 -0600
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-30 11:54 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:29 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:35 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> - 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:14 -0600
csiph-web