Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <n7bh61$csp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> |
| Subject | Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| References | <ddpc8vF69dfU5@mid.individual.net> <df49pcF8opiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600 |
On 15/01/2016 19:07, Bo Persson wrote: > > > On 2016-01-05 20:16, Ian Collins wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Has there ever been a move to formally identify standard library >> headers that don't require run time (especially dynamic allocation) >> support? An obvious example would be <array>. >> >> The reason I ask is to make at least a subset of the standard library >> available to smaller embedded projects. >>  >> >> > > No, I don't think so. > > The standards committee is, in general, not very fond of defining > language subsets. They strongly prefer compilers to implement the > whole language. > > > Bo Persson > > > Yes, but I do not think this is about defining language subsets but is more akin to the complexity guarantees. And on that line I would prefer to see no run time support marked as a requirement where it can be achieved. Francis -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-01-05 13:16 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:18 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-04-01 19:07 -0600
csiph-web