Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.std.c++ > #778

Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support

Message-ID <4877584f-3d14-4405-a8cc-3f2f96fd7593@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Newsgroups comp.std.c++
From Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support
Organization unknown
References <ddpc8vF69dfU5@mid.individual.net>
Date 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 20:20:10 UTC+1, Ian Collins  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has there ever been a move to formally identify standard library
> headers that don't require run time (especially dynamic allocation)
> support?  An obvious example would be <array>.
>
> The reason I ask is to make at least a subset of the standard library
> available to smaller embedded projects.


I don't think so.  It seems like a useful exercise if you want to start.

Expect arguments about whether "exceptions" require run-time support.

Expect arguments about whether it means "headers that are forbidden from
requiring run-time support" or "headers that could be implemented
without using run-time support".

Perhaps "header" is too coarse a granularity?

... but, I repeat, it still sounds like a broadly worthwhile exercise.



--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-01-05 13:16 -0600
  Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
  Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
    Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
    Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
      Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:18 -0600
  Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-04-01 19:07 -0600

csiph-web