Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <3fa2e85e-550f-4efc-ba6a-e522852dc322@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> |
| Subject | Re: proposal : keyword default |
| Organization | unknown |
| References | (1 earlier) <f7909d88-eef3-4c68-864f-09912789dc89@googlegroups.com> <FOOdncbkK9Y5uNPPnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <l2nojk$10h$1@dont-email.me> <u-ydncvlzM5_7szPnZ2dnUVZ7qydnZ2d@bt.com> <l2ucul$tg3$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2013-10-12 03:47 -0600 |
Am Montag, 7. Oktober 2013 22:10:01 UTC+2 schrieb Edward Diener: > On 10/7/2013 3:50 AM, Francis Glassborow wrote: > > If you stop to consider it, it should be clear that this would have > > > been considered right at the start of the design of default arguments > > > for C++. It wasn't that it was hard to do, so there must have been > > > other reasons (I am pretty sure they will have been mentioned > > > somewhere in 'The Design and Evolution of C++') > > > > You may be crediting Mr. Stroustrup with too much foresight. Nonetheless > > if you have any particular discussion to cite about this in D&E or > > otherwise I would be glad to peruse it. Maybe Francis Glassborow refers to 6.5 "Examples of Proposed Extensions", 6.5.1 "Keyword Arguments". The last paragraph is "My main worry about keyword arguments was actually that keyword arguments might slow the gradual transition from traditional programming techniques to data abstraction and object-oriented programming in C++. In code that I find best written and easiest to obtain, long argument lists are very rare". IMHO the same can be said about the proposed keyword default and the same alternatives as in Chapter 6.5.1.1 can be used. Helmut -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: proposal : keyword default alexander.stoyan@googlemail.com - 2013-10-03 13:25 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2013-10-04 11:19 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-04 11:58 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2013-10-05 19:19 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2013-10-07 01:50 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2013-10-05 19:19 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2013-10-07 01:50 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2013-10-07 15:05 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-10-08 12:36 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> - 2013-10-12 03:47 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2013-10-12 11:36 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default ootiib@hot.ee - 2013-10-12 23:10 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-10-13 11:33 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2013-10-16 10:34 -0600
Re: proposal : keyword default Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> - 2013-10-14 20:37 -0700
Re: proposal : keyword default Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2013-10-18 01:20 -0600
csiph-web