Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.std.c++ > #731

Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member

Message-ID <lvekvm$khq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Newsgroups comp.std.c++
From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Subject Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
References <3bd8af8c-bcd3-4fca-a7ce-3e1a3e1dc21b@googlegroups.com> <0afb2699-65e9-4a05-9f0b-c8bae7a18ad9@googlegroups.com> <a49b07f5-e922-4e9e-977a-cb9dddd86928@googlegroups.com>
Date 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/17/2014 09:29 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:10:03 PM UTC-7, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 2:30:01 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> Taken from:
>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3242.pdf
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> 8.5.1 / 15 When a union is initialized with a brace-enclosed initializer,
>>> the braces shall only contain an initializer-clause for the first non-
>>> static data member of the union.
>>>
>>> [ Example:
>>> union u { int a; const char* b; };
>>> u a = { 1 };
>>> u b = a;
>>> u c = 1; // error
>>> u d = { 0, "asdf" }; // error
>>> u e = { "asdf" }; // error
>>> --end example ]
>>> ----------
>>
>>
>> If no one objects, I propose this limitation be removed and replaced
>> with an allowance for compile-time initializer clauses to any union
>> member.
>
> Don't C99 designated initializers solve this problem?

They would, and changing C++ to support them would be a better approach
than the one suggested above.
--
James Kuyper


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com - 2014-08-30 13:29 -0600
  Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-16 21:01 -0600
    Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Philip Guenther <guenther@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-17 19:29 -0600
      Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
        Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-20 01:37 -0600
          Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-09-23 14:52 -0600
            Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-24 16:30 -0600
      Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first  member James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
      Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Francis Glassborow <Francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600

csiph-web