Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.std.c++

comp.std.c++

714 articles, 225 threads (numbers 76 – 789) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support (6 replies) Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> 2016-01-05 13:16 -0600
   → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
   → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
     → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
     → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
       → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> 2016-02-20 15:18 -0600
   → Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2016-04-01 19:07 -0600
 
Amend request (throwing error) WIJ <wij@totalbb.net.tw> 2016-03-18 13:13 -0600
 
C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs (2 replies) Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de> 2016-02-20 15:19 -0600
   → Re: C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs Christof Meerwald <NOSPAM-seeMySig+ul15+@usenet.cmeerw.org> 2016-03-16 01:07 -0600
   → Re: C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de> 2016-03-16 01:07 -0600
 
Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes W Karas <wkaras@this.is.invalid> 2016-03-16 01:05 -0600
 
Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type. Edward Rosten <firstname.dot.lastname@googlemail.com> 2016-03-16 01:06 -0600
 
Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies (1 reply) Jonathan Jones <jhjones1969@googlemail.com> 2015-09-12 11:24 -0600
   → Re: Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2015-09-13 07:51 -0600
 
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? (7 replies) Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> 2015-07-27 11:22 -0600
   → Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> 2015-07-30 11:54 -0600
     → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> 2015-08-01 21:09 -0600
       → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600
         → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> 2015-08-16 17:29 -0600
           → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-08-18 22:35 -0600
   → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600
     → Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> 2015-08-21 19:14 -0600
 
Unicode support in C++ 17 (1 reply) stg <mail@glenstark.net> 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600
   → Re: Unicode support in C++ 17 Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-08-14 13:33 -0600
 
Re: Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments vervaeck.sam@googlemail.com 2015-07-30 13:12 -0600
 
Conflicting extern variable declarations Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0@googlemail.com> 2015-07-15 13:55 -0600
 
How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit" (1 reply) Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2015-06-28 15:17 -0600
   → Re: How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit" Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-06-29 13:29 -0600
 
Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads (2 replies) itaj sherman <itajsherman@googlemail.com> 2015-06-22 14:22 -0600
   → Re: Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads via.usov@googlemail.com 2015-06-25 14:32 -0600
   → Re: Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads itaj sherman <itajsherman@googlemail.com> 2015-06-26 01:29 -0600
 
tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators (1 reply) Arno Schoedl <arnoschoedl@googlemail.com> 2015-05-19 01:59 -0600
   → Re: tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-05-21 21:09 -0600
 
Macro replacement interpretation (12 replies) Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> 2015-03-26 12:09 -0600
   → Re: Macro replacement interpretation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-03-27 14:07 -0600
   → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-03-29 03:01 -0600
     → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-03-30 12:20 -0600
     → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> 2015-03-30 12:21 -0600
       → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-03-31 15:39 -0600
         → Re: Macro replacement interpretation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-04-01 16:39 -0600
       → Re: Macro replacement interpretation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-03-31 15:38 -0600
         → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-04-01 16:38 -0600
           → Re: Macro replacement interpretation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-04-02 13:24 -0600
             → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-04-03 14:30 -0600
         → Re: Macro replacement interpretation Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> 2015-04-03 14:30 -0600
           → Re: Macro replacement interpretation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-04-04 15:50 -0600
 
object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation (2 replies) via.usov@googlemail.com 2015-02-28 14:59 -0600
   → Re: object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> 2015-03-26 12:09 -0600
     → Re: object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation via.usov@googlemail.com 2015-03-30 12:21 -0600
 
Re: Moving local objects into lambda closure avi.kivity@googlemail.com 2015-02-04 13:15 -0600
 
constexpr parameters Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@noemail.com> 2014-10-22 01:06 -0600
 
Destructive erase for associative containers (1 reply) travis@gockelhut.com 2014-10-10 14:51 -0600
   → Re: Destructive erase for associative containers Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2014-10-15 13:27 -0600
 
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member (8 replies) rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com 2014-08-30 13:29 -0600
   → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> 2014-09-16 21:01 -0600
     → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Philip Guenther <guenther@googlemail.com> 2014-09-17 19:29 -0600
       → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
         → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> 2014-09-20 01:37 -0600
           → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2014-09-23 14:52 -0600
             → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> 2014-09-24 16:30 -0600
       → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
       → Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Francis Glassborow <Francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
 
alignment with ISO C11 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> 2014-08-27 12:27 -0600

~Page 1 of ~12 (articles 726–789) Older →


csiph-web