Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| Message-ID | <9a05e6e8-ab78-482e-ae47-fb10626b5bea@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member |
| Organization | unknown |
| References | <3bd8af8c-bcd3-4fca-a7ce-3e1a3e1dc21b@googlegroups.com> <0afb2699-65e9-4a05-9f0b-c8bae7a18ad9@googlegroups.com> <a49b07f5-e922-4e9e-977a-cb9dddd86928@googlegroups.com> <74729178-1dcf-48c5-93a2-bf00314f7e10@googlegroups.com> <673d41b7-8394-4e0a-ad40-c422d1941b20@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2014-09-23 14:52 -0600 |
On Saturday, 20 September 2014 07:40:02 UTC+1, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Should have been:
> -----
> I would like the compiler to determine the union member by its type
> when possible.
>
> struct SExample
> {
> union {
> int i;
> float f;
> };
> };
>
> SExample myArray[] =
> {
> { 10 }, // Initialized to i member as int
> { 3.14f } // Initialized to f member as float
> };
>
> Also, on conflicting types, such as 5 for int and
> char, if the bytes they occupy would all map to
> the same location in the union, the cast would
> not be required.
That would be a terrible idea! It means that code would
compile on a little-endian machine, but not a big-endian one.
(For example)
I agree that C99 designated initializers would be a much
better solution:
- They have already been cast into standardese.
- If gcc doesn't support them for C++, it's probably not hard to
make it do so (so we can gain implementation experience).
- They would be of more general utility than just initializing
unions.
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com - 2014-08-30 13:29 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-16 21:01 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Philip Guenther <guenther@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-17 19:29 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-20 01:37 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-09-23 14:52 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@googlemail.com> - 2014-09-24 16:30 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
Re: N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member Francis Glassborow <Francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2014-09-19 01:06 -0600
csiph-web