Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75764 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300 |
| Last post | 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 453 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 14:39 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-07 22:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:35 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 10:53 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-08 21:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:21 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:15 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:46 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:09 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 18:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 17:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-11 19:01 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:32 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:29 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-12 11:07 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 09:06 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-18 16:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-18 21:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-19 01:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:39 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:31 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 19:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-19 12:17 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 02:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:28 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:19 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-25 12:49 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 16:45 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:51 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 08:42 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 09:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 19:48 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 00:44 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 00:57 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:14 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:05 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 02:00 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 14:52 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:29 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 10:09 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:23 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:47 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 07:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:05 +0000
Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 13:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 20:21 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-29 01:41 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-29 11:07 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-29 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-29 22:15 +0000
Re: Accents. Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-10-30 17:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-30 17:31 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 19:31 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:14 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:11 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:35 +0100
Re: Accents. candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-30 21:40 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 15:18 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:17 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:46 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:25 +0000
LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 20:50 -0400
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:14 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:41 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:57 +0000
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 00:12 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 00:19 -0500
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 14:20 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:02 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:42 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:31 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:16 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:51 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:48 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:42 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:21 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:59 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:41 +0100
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 08:56 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:53 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-31 19:02 -0700
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:32 +0000
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:19 +0000
TV tropes (was: Re: Accents.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-20 11:01 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 13:10 +0100
Re: TV tropes Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-20 17:57 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 21:28 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:10 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:14 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:09 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 07:41 +0000
Re: TV tropes Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-21 09:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:13 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:17 +0100
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 19:28 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:43 +0100
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 23:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 04:06 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:24 +0100
Re: Not Blade Runner Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:57 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:22 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:22 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:50 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:20 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:34 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:47 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:05 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Blade runner c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 15:40 -0500
Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 22:30 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 17:48 -0500
Re: Flashlights Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-11-03 20:26 -0800
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-05 03:44 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 01:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:20 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 20:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:26 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 11:56 +0100
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:30 -0500
Re: Flashlights candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-11-07 16:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-07 18:11 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 22:42 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-07 21:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-08 13:31 +0100
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-08 16:05 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-08 20:06 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-09 00:04 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-09 20:08 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-10 12:07 +0000
Re: Flashlights John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> - 2025-11-09 19:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 05:09 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 01:31 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:39 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 07:51 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:39 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 22:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:52 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:32 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 06:49 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-22 03:14 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 11:32 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 22:00 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 09:40 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 20:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 01:42 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 02:17 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 21:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-24 15:04 -0800
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-24 22:48 -0500
Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 07:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 03:43 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 09:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:14 -0800
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:54 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 18:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:32 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:39 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 22:26 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 07:34 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 02:40 -0500
City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 11:18 +0100
Re: City fauna rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:40 +0000
Re: City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 12:39 +0100
Re: City fauna The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:56 +0000
Re: City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 13:16 +0100
Re: City fauna rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:39 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 18:55 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:40 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:03 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:36 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:31 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 22:00 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 05:08 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 21:02 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-26 13:29 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 01:57 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:13 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:47 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:09 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:45 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:37 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 23:47 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 06:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 01:38 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 02:58 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 09:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 05:20 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 11:28 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:32 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:19 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 11:45 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 11:41 +0000
Punt guns. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:03 +0100
Re: Punt guns. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 13:19 +0000
Re: Punt guns. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:43 +0100
Re: Punt guns. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:42 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 22:10 -0500
Punt guns "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:06 +0100
Re: Punt guns Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-29 08:58 -0800
Re: Punt guns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:34 -0500
Re: Punt guns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-30 01:05 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 19:19 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:25 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 08:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-28 20:14 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 19:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-28 21:04 +0100
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 01:55 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:39 -0500
Bears "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:07 +0100
Re: Bears c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-30 00:51 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:09 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:12 -0500
Repopulating bears, wolves... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:10 +0100
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-29 08:53 -0800
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:59 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:49 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:19 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-30 03:57 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-30 10:33 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:32 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:46 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:40 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:48 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:07 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 19:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 20:23 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:13 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:17 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:21 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:29 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:13 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 09:19 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 23:16 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:10 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:17 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:26 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:10 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 06:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:27 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 19:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:22 -0500
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 20:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:23 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:23 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:05 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:21 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:54 -0500
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:17 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-05 11:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:41 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:16 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 22:22 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:10 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:24 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 02:44 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 21:53 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:12 +0100
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 23:14 +0100
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:01 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:19 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:33 +0000
Blade runner. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:29 +0100
Re: Blade runner. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:56 +0000
Re: Blade runner. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 21:38 -0400
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:31 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:48 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:22 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 23:36 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:51 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:48 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 15:03 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:15 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:39 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:26 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:44 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:05 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:54 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:49 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:13 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 18:48 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:12 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:11 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 12:26 +0000
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-03 09:17 -0800
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:42 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:01 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:33 +0000
Re: Accents. Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:43 -0700
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-02 19:30 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:21 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-30 22:48 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:58 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:25 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:09 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:29 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:50 -0700
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:28 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:27 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:41 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:36 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:11 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:54 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-28 09:34 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-26 13:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-10-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-27 08:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:37 +0100
OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-02 18:49 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 06:54 +0000
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-03 08:19 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 09:34 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-27 21:26 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 03:36 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 01:33 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:52 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-12 02:43 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:12 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:02 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 06:39 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-12 02:59 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-13 16:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 18:38 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:45 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:17 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 03:28 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-13 03:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:55 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 21:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 00:35 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:21 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 06:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-14 17:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 20:01 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-15 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:24 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 06:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 09:00 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:27 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-16 07:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-17 22:24 -0400
Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:08 +0200
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:15 -0400
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:46 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-16 04:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 10:29 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 01:49 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 15:43 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-14 21:30 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-14 22:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100
Page 21 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 Next page →
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-02 18:49 -0800 |
| Subject | OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? |
| Message-ID | <10e957o$2j865$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76980 |
On 11/2/25 17:37, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-02 15:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 02/11/2025 14:11, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> Le 27-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Everybody invaded/colonized everyone else in >>>> Europe/UK so often that "foreign" words and >>>> customs aren't worth mentioning. >>> >>> You say that because you aren't interested in history. But when someone >>> is interested in history, knowing where a word is coming from, when it >>> came in the language and why is very interesting. Your lack of interest >>> is only your: you are not the only one whose opinion matters. You should >>> avoid imposing your opinion on others. I know, here the far right and >>> far left are very numerous, but they are equally wrong in the belief >>> that everyone outside of they vision should be killed. >>> >> >> Not even the far right think that. > > Yes, they do. I have seen them actually try. They do that is why the far right is so dangerous. They spread the idea that parts of society are so evil they must be killed and the next thing you know someone takes them as seriously as they do themselves. They show up at events and commit murders of Jews, Homosexuals, Catholics at mass, blowup churchs that belong to black people. i am not talking about imaginary events but those that have happened in the USA. In France the events have been from your Right wing religious nut cases who just happen to be Muslims. In other nations other horrible events have happened based on the same Islamic-Fascism.. > >> Only the Islamist Jihadis. And some of the mentally unstable far left. Baloney. Far left in the America's is confined to Cuba and Venezula and their governments struggle for power when they lose an election. Of course in Cuba only one party is allowed. In Venezula they ignore the result of an election and persecute the winner. Here in the USA we had one man who killed a good man and barely wounded his target and he was neither right nor left but confused by the rhetoric of the Right Wing decided assassination was the game to play. Another did not even get his rifle out of the car before he was apprended. In Brazil we had a Right winger who approved of the Death Squads terrorizing and Murdering people whom they thought were not good people based on their faiths or merely on the intent to show they were in control. He was replaced with a Centrist whom Trump would like to replace and the former Right Winger Bolsonaro was sent to prison.>> >> But it is correct that the greatest insights into people's worldviews >> happen when they criticise the worldviews of others. Have you heard of or read Project 2025 in the the USA. It is the fever dream of the Christo-Fascists. To turn a secular nation from the path of the founders to create a Theocracy. They don't care what damage the citizens will sustain and this is the book Trump has been following while denying the same. bliss- Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2025.10 Linux 6.12.56-pclos1- KDE Plasma 6.5.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 06:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? |
| Message-ID | <mmr1thF6gaiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76986 |
On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 18:49:26 -0800, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > They show up at events and commit murders > of Jews, Homosexuals, Catholics at mass, blowup churchs that belong > to black people. i am not talking about imaginary events but those > that have happened in the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annunciation_Catholic_Church_shooting Too bad the shooter at the Catholic church was a trannie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 08:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? |
| Message-ID | <10eakmk$30g36$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76988 |
On 11/2/25 22:54, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 18:49:26 -0800, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > >> They show up at events and commit murders >> of Jews, Homosexuals, Catholics at mass, blowup churchs that belong >> to black people. i am not talking about imaginary events but those >> that have happened in the USA. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annunciation_Catholic_Church_shooting > > Too bad the shooter at the Catholic church was a trannie. I have met many disturbed people who believed that they were transgender people. Generally they continued their slow self-destruction with alcohol or other drugs but some committed suicide. But when you blame groups of people for the unhappiness that pervades society due to various problems then you will have confused people. Transgender people are only interested in transitioning from whatever their present designation is to another and they concentrate on following doctor's directions and trying to save money for whatever surgery they want to have. Some don't want surgery at all because they want to be women or men and are not satisfied with the current state of body modification surgeries which are quite primitive. And if you are keeping score lots of Transgender Male to Female variety are murdered but I think women are far ahead in terms of death and survivial of violence usually by males. But even Brandon Teena a Female to Male transgender was murdered out of male jealousy. He was taking the women that males considered their local property away, they thought. <https://www.triviavoices.com/the-inconvenient-truth-about-teena-brandon.html> An incest survivor. Researching this i read about other murders which were not as well publicized. For Transgender Male to Female there are lists. <https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › List_of_people_killed_for_being_transgender> These murders are endless and few male to female transgender realize that in asserting that they are women they open themselved to misogenic violence. Femicide is the term used. <https://vpc.org/press/nearly-nine-out-of-10-women-murdered-by-men-are-killed-by-someone-they-know-and-two-thirds-die-by-gunfire-new-violence-policy-center-study-finds/> That raises several other questions ignored by the violence wing of the former Republican Party. Some want to call it the Rebelpuclican party since it advocates a return to the White Male Supremacy of the Confederacy. bliss
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 10:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? |
| Message-ID | <10e9vhc$2pbk3$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76986 |
On 03/11/2025 02:49, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > They do that is why the far right is so dangerous. > They spread the idea that parts of society are so evil they must be > killed and the next thing you know someone takes them as seriously > as they do themselves. They show up at events and commit murders > of Jews, Homosexuals, Catholics at mass, blowup churchs that belong > to black people. i am not talking about imaginary events but those > that have happened in the USA. > In France the events have been from your Right wing religious > nut cases who just happen to be Muslims. In other nations other > horrible events have happened based on the same Islamic-Fascism.. No. The far left is the group embracing Muslims and chanting anti-semitic slogans here. -- "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-27 09:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20251027093408.00001ae5@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #76664 |
On 25 Oct 2025 12:49:55 GMT Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: > But what is "new" to me, I mean not from yesterday, but from a few > years, is that it works in the other way around, too. Some French > words are used in English because they sound cool. And they are far > more than what I knew/guessed a few years ago. Yeah - English speakers adopting French terms isn't as common as it used to be,* but a lot of the expressions that have been imported over the centuries are still in semi-common use. * (It'd be interesting to trace this behavior in a global context over time - these days, for example, most of our novel loanwords seem to come from Japanese, post-anime boom.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-27 21:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mma6cvFb82dU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76748 |
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:34:08 -0700, John Ames wrote: > * (It'd be interesting to trace this behavior in a global context over > time - these days, for example, most of our novel loanwords seem to > come from Japanese, post-anime boom.) https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/a-word-on-omarchy/ "The name Omarchy appears to be a portmanteau of Arch, the Linux distribution that Hansson’s configuration is based upon, and お任せ, which translates to omakase and means to leave something up to someone else (任せ る, makaseru, to entrust). When ordering omakase in a restaurant, you’re leaving it up to the chef to serve you whatever they think is best. Oma(kase) + (A)rch + y is supposedly where the name comes from." I haven't seen Hansson explain the name. He might be right. https://anarchyinstaller.gitlab.io/ The Anarchy installer is more explicit :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 03:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kY-cnTj8wb50CWn1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #76314 |
On 10/18/25 12:24, Rich wrote: > Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >> Le 11-10-2025, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> a écrit : >>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>>>> >>>>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>>>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>>>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>>>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>>>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>>>> scripting language. >>>> >>>> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. >> >> I didn't knew that. > > English has borrowed many words from many other languages, French > included. "Caca" is likely an example of on that English has borrowed > from French. > > English meaning is the same as in French: > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/caca "English" is a huge "pidgeon" ... a mix of every language belonging to its many many invaders. IS good for coming up with new terms however.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 19:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10cebb6$10h1p$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75946 |
On 11 Oct 2025 15:10:28 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > In French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French > caca means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript > can understand it's shit designing javascript. JavaScript actually has some good parts. It also now has “strict mode”, so you can protect yourself from some of the stupider parts. Of course, I mainly use it in web pages. I have no experience writing code for NodeJS, for example, so someone who had to might have a different opinion ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 01:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml0erpFh6skU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #75953 |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 19:31:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On 11 Oct 2025 15:10:28 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> In French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >> understand it's shit designing javascript. > > JavaScript actually has some good parts. It also now has “strict mode”, > so you can protect yourself from some of the stupider parts. > > Of course, I mainly use it in web pages. I have no experience writing > code for NodeJS, for example, so someone who had to might have a > different opinion ... TypeScript helps a little but it isn't foolproof. One of our spelling challenged programmers inadvertently added a field to the equivalent of a C struct. Setting baar = true doesn't help much when another section of code checks for the value of bar. I wonder if Eich ever wakes up at 3 AM wondering about what he unleashed on the world? https://thenewstack.io/brendan-eich-on-creating-javascript-in-10-days-and-what-hed-do-differently-today/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 22:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2lsqrlxj0t.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #75946 |
On 2025-10-11 17:10, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >> >> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and >> fuckin' JAVASCRIPT ........ > > You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In > French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca means > shit. Hehe, same meaning in Spanish :-D > So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can understand > it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could be > translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any > scripting language. > -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 22:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10cemsb$13ku8$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75957 |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:52:18 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: > Because in French caca means shit. > > Hehe, same meaning in Spanish :-D I often wondered about “Lake Titicaca” ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 02:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <j6arrlx2l1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #75961 |
On 2025-10-12 00:48, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:52:18 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> Because in French caca means shit. >> >> Hehe, same meaning in Spanish :-D > > I often wondered about “Lake Titicaca” ... :-) Must derive from a local language, I guess. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 12:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10cg2e6$1dscj$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75963 |
On 12/10/2025 01:43, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-10-12 00:48, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:52:18 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> Because in French caca means shit. >>> >>> Hehe, same meaning in Spanish :-D >> >> I often wondered about “Lake Titicaca” ... > > :-) > > Must derive from a local language, I guess. > "The name "Titicaca" is widely believed to be a Spanish corruption of the Aymara phrase titi qala or titi q'aq'a, meaning "stone puma" or "gray puma". This name likely refers to the lake's shape, which resembles a puma, or to a sacred carved rock on Isla del Sol that has the shape of a puma" -- No Apple devices were knowingly used in the preparation of this post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 22:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <W-WcnRpsBfS4kXb1nZ2dnZfqnPhj4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #75946 |
On 10/11/25 11:10, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >> >> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and >> fuckin' JAVASCRIPT ........ > > You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In > French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca means > shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can understand > it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could be > translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any > scripting language. Well, even without perfect translation, we all GET IT :-) PHP is bliss by comparison.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 06:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml10ohFjo94U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #75973 |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:02:11 -0400, c186282 wrote: > On 10/11/25 11:10, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>> >>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >> >> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >> scripting language. > > Well, even without perfect translation, we all GET IT :-) > > PHP is bliss by comparison. It was a sad day when Personal Home Page survived the era when Mon and Pop clobbered together a HTML 2.0 website.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 02:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dRmcnVDZc-sizHb1nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #75982 |
On 10/12/25 02:39, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:02:11 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> On 10/11/25 11:10, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>> >>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>> scripting language. >> >> Well, even without perfect translation, we all GET IT :-) >> >> PHP is bliss by comparison. > > It was a sad day when Personal Home Page survived the era when Mon and Pop > clobbered together a HTML 2.0 website. Well ... PHP does still have it's place - and I've coded a lot of it. It's two main virtues ... it has 'C'-like syntax/reasoning and it runs on the server instead of burdening your PC. Had a web page with a sign-in ... to "punish" those who didn't have the password I wrote a short JS script with a massive floating-point/trig equation that repeated as fast as possible. Get it wrong and your PC fan would cut in full immediately and a bunch of warnings would appear in the browser :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml2dbpFr8pnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #75983 |
On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 02:59:09 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Had a web page with a sign-in ... to "punish" those who didn't have > the password I wrote a short JS script with a massive > floating-point/trig equation that repeated as fast as possible. Get > it wrong and your PC fan would cut in full immediately and a bunch of > warnings would appear in the browser You would be a ball of laughs with a rubber ducky. https://github.com/hak5/usbrubberducky-payloads If you have a Pico the Adafruit CircuitPython bundle has a handy adafruit_pid lib.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-13 16:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn10eqar7.290ek.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #76014 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote at 19:20 this Sunday (GMT): > On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 02:59:09 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Had a web page with a sign-in ... to "punish" those who didn't have >> the password I wrote a short JS script with a massive >> floating-point/trig equation that repeated as fast as possible. Get >> it wrong and your PC fan would cut in full immediately and a bunch of >> warnings would appear in the browser I think most browsers sandbox their tabs better. so it wouldn't be too much of an issue for the end user. I'd still find it incredibly annoying, though. > You would be a ball of laughs with a rubber ducky. > > https://github.com/hak5/usbrubberducky-payloads > > If you have a Pico the Adafruit CircuitPython bundle has a handy > adafruit_pid lib. That looks really cool, I'll check it out :D -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-13 18:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10cjddr$2b6bo$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76067 |
>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 02:59:09 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Had a web page with a sign-in ... to "punish" those who didn't have >>> the password I wrote a short JS script with a massive >>> floating-point/trig equation that repeated as fast as possible. Get >>> it wrong and your PC fan would cut in full immediately and a bunch of >>> warnings would appear in the browser My first thought, given this involves floating point, is: Is this somehow exploitable by using an Intel Pentium? -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-14 01:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <BNGcnV-ffphbfHD1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #76070 |
On 10/13/25 13:38, Nuno Silva wrote: >>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 02:59:09 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> Had a web page with a sign-in ... to "punish" those who didn't have >>>> the password I wrote a short JS script with a massive >>>> floating-point/trig equation that repeated as fast as possible. Get >>>> it wrong and your PC fan would cut in full immediately and a bunch of >>>> warnings would appear in the browser > > My first thought, given this involves floating point, is: > > Is this somehow exploitable by using an Intel Pentium? That old old bug ??? Dunno. 99.99999% wouldn't know how anyway - just get browser-freezing overheating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 21 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web