Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75764 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300 |
| Last post | 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 380 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 14:39 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-07 22:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:35 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 10:53 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-08 21:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:21 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:15 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:46 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:09 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 18:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 17:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-11 19:01 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:32 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:29 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-12 11:07 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 09:06 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-18 16:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-18 21:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-19 01:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:39 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:31 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 19:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-19 12:17 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 02:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:28 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:19 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-25 12:49 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 16:45 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:51 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 08:42 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 09:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 19:48 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 00:44 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 00:57 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:14 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:05 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 02:00 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 14:52 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:29 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 10:09 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:23 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:47 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 07:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:05 +0000
Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 13:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 20:21 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-29 01:41 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-29 11:07 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-29 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-29 22:15 +0000
Re: Accents. Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-10-30 17:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-30 17:31 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 19:31 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:14 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:11 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:35 +0100
Re: Accents. candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-30 21:40 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 15:18 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:17 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:46 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:25 +0000
LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 20:50 -0400
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:14 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:41 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:57 +0000
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 00:12 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 00:19 -0500
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 14:20 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:02 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:42 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:31 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:16 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:51 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:48 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:42 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:21 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:59 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:41 +0100
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 08:56 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:53 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-31 19:02 -0700
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:32 +0000
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:19 +0000
TV tropes (was: Re: Accents.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-20 11:01 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 13:10 +0100
Re: TV tropes Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-20 17:57 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 21:28 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:10 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:14 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:09 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 07:41 +0000
Re: TV tropes Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-21 09:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:13 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:17 +0100
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 19:28 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:43 +0100
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 23:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 04:06 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:24 +0100
Re: Not Blade Runner Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:57 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:22 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:22 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:50 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:20 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:34 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:47 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:05 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Blade runner c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 15:40 -0500
Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 22:30 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 17:48 -0500
Re: Flashlights Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-11-03 20:26 -0800
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-05 03:44 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 01:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:20 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 20:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:26 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 11:56 +0100
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:30 -0500
Re: Flashlights candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-11-07 16:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-07 18:11 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 22:42 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-07 21:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-08 13:31 +0100
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-08 16:05 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-08 20:06 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-09 00:04 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-09 20:08 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-10 12:07 +0000
Re: Flashlights John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> - 2025-11-09 19:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 05:09 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 01:31 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:39 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 07:51 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:39 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 22:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:52 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:32 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 06:49 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-22 03:14 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 11:32 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 22:00 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 09:40 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 20:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 01:42 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 02:17 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 21:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-24 15:04 -0800
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-24 22:48 -0500
Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 07:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 03:43 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 09:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:14 -0800
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:54 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 18:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:32 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:39 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 22:26 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 07:34 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 02:40 -0500
City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 11:18 +0100
Re: City fauna rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:39 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:40 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:31 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 22:00 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 05:08 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 21:02 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-26 13:29 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 01:57 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:13 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:40 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:27 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 19:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:22 -0500
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 20:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:23 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:23 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:05 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:21 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:54 -0500
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:17 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-05 11:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:41 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:16 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 22:22 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:10 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:24 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 02:44 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 21:53 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:12 +0100
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 23:14 +0100
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:01 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:19 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:33 +0000
Blade runner. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:29 +0100
Re: Blade runner. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:56 +0000
Re: Blade runner. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 21:38 -0400
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:31 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:48 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:22 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 23:36 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:51 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:48 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 15:03 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:15 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:39 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:26 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:44 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:05 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:54 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:49 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:13 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 18:48 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:12 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:11 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 12:26 +0000
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-03 09:17 -0800
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:42 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:01 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:33 +0000
Re: Accents. Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:43 -0700
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-02 19:30 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:21 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-30 22:48 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:58 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:25 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:09 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:29 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:50 -0700
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:28 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:27 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:41 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:36 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:11 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:54 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-28 09:34 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-26 13:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-10-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-27 08:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:37 +0100
OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-02 18:49 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 06:54 +0000
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-03 08:19 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 09:34 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-27 21:26 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 03:36 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 01:33 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:52 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-12 02:43 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:12 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:02 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 06:39 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-12 02:59 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-13 16:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 18:38 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:45 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:17 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 03:28 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-13 03:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:55 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 21:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 00:35 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:21 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 06:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-14 17:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 20:01 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-15 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:24 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 06:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 09:00 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:27 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-16 07:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-17 22:24 -0400
Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:08 +0200
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:15 -0400
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:46 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-16 04:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 10:29 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 01:49 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 15:43 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-14 21:30 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-14 22:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100
Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19 Next page →
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-02 21:34 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Blade runner |
| Message-ID | <6srktlxvn8.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #76963 |
On 2025-11-02 20:20, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 15:50:05 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> On 2025-11-02 02:22, rbowman wrote: >>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:22:21 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>> >>>> That may be normal police procedure: do not touch anything, not even >>>> the lights. The light switches have to photographed and analyzed for >>>> fingerprints or adn. Using something else to wrap your finger and then >>>> touch the switch may actually fudge or erase the fingerprint. >>> >>> True, but they're stomping through the place yelling 'Clear!' until >>> they fall over a dead body or a crim tries to make them a dead body. >>> >>> As an aside, the old school police didn't really like the new, small, >>> very bright LED flashlights. Maybe you couldn't see as well but if you >>> slap someone with a 6 D cell Maglite they stay slapped. >> >> True. I have one of those somewhere, strong aluminum. > > I put a LED bulb in mine. It's an improvement over the Xenon bulb but not > as good as the current cheap LED flashlights. I think it's about 250 > lumens. Those big torches with big batteries should power something with 3000 lumens. > > There is a more expensive replacement that costs a lot more than a simple > bulb change and a lot more than a $20 1000 lumen flashlight. > Oh. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 02:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Blade runner |
| Message-ID | <mmqjdmF3kvrU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76970 |
On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 21:34:46 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > Those big torches with big batteries should power something with 3000 > lumens. https://hackaday.com/tag/cree/ The problem with retrofitting a Maglite is the Cree emitters need controllers and heatsinks. Those are the expensive replacements. https://www.instructables.com/LED-Maglite-CREE-XM-L-Modification/ That's a DIY Here's a commercial module. https://lumencraft.com/home/158-3500-lumen-3x-xhp50-dropin-bulb-for-magltie-6-d-cell.html https://www.candlepowerforums.com/threads/maglite-led-or-cree-maglite-upgrade.398018/ Nice write up discussing the cheap drop-ins versus high output.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 13:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Blade runner |
| Message-ID | <ndimtlxmkj.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #76984 |
On 2025-11-03 03:47, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 21:34:46 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> Those big torches with big batteries should power something with 3000 >> lumens. > > https://hackaday.com/tag/cree/ > > The problem with retrofitting a Maglite is the Cree emitters need controllers and heatsinks. Those are the expensive replacements. > > https://www.instructables.com/LED-Maglite-CREE-XM-L-Modification/ > > That's a DIY Here's a commercial module. > > > > https://lumencraft.com/home/158-3500-lumen-3x-xhp50-dropin-bulb-for-magltie-6-d-cell.html > > https://www.candlepowerforums.com/threads/maglite-led-or-cree-maglite-upgrade.398018/ > > Nice write up discussing the cheap drop-ins versus high output. Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Blade runner |
| Message-ID | <mmsg77Fe1c6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76997 |
On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > > Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 15:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Blade runner |
| Message-ID | <_82dnatebubDjpT0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77007 |
On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> >> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o > > https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) IMALENT MS32 https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights-Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC?tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd (note US links may not work in the UK/EU)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 22:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <dgjntlxjtb.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #77008 |
On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: > On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> >>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >> >> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ > > Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) > > IMALENT MS32 > > https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights-Rechargeable/ > dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? > tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd You can shorten that to: <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights-Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> or even <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> > > (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this profile. But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it upwards, and use the reflection back. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 17:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <_82dnaRebualrJT0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77009 |
On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>> >>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >> >> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >> >> IMALENT MS32 >> >> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >> tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd > > You can shorten that to: > > <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- > Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> > > or even > > <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> > >> >> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) > > Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long as > I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this profile. > > > But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. > I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create > glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light source, > to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it upwards, and use > the reflection back. How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera flashbulbs ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-03 20:26 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <10ebv9k$1fsdl$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #77011 |
c186282 wrote: > On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >>> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>>> >>>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >>> >>> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >>> >>> IMALENT MS32 >>> >>> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >>> tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd >> >> You can shorten that to: >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >> Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >> >> or even >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >> >>> >>> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) >> >> Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long >> as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this >> profile. >> >> >> But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. > > > VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest > then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) > > The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. > >> I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create >> glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light >> source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it >> upwards, and use the reflection back. > > How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) > > Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use > where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside > your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera > flashbulbs ? Weren't they aluminum? -- *********** To reply by e-mail, make w single in address **************
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-04 04:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <slrn10gj1pd.ro0.spamtrap42@one.localnet> |
| In reply to | #77012 |
On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: > c186282 wrote: > >> On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >>>> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>>>> >>>>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >>>> >>>> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >>>> >>>> IMALENT MS32 >>>> >>>> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >>>> > tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd >>> >>> You can shorten that to: >>> >>> <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>> Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>> >>> or even >>> >>> <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>> >>>> >>>> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) >>> >>> Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long >>> as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this >>> profile. >>> >>> >>> But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. >> >> >> VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest >> then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) >> >> The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. >> >>> I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create >>> glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light >>> source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it >>> upwards, and use the reflection back. >> >> How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) >> >> Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use >> where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside >> your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera >> flashbulbs ? > > Weren't they aluminum? If I understand the question correctly, flashLIGHTs (hand-held devices that emit a continuous beam of light) were (mostly) aluminum, while flashBULBs (very brief, small fraction of a second, flash of light for photography) were magnesium. Of course, there were other things one could do with a flashbulb. A friend of mine used them for pranking coworkers, his son, etc. I found some bulbs at a thrift store and gave them to him. He grinned. :-) He would wire up a flashbulb inside his son's desktop computer or under a circuit board at work. When the son powered on the computer or the coworkers powered on the board, the bright flash of light would cause the victim to think he had just destroyed the machine or board in question. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-04 02:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <TrWcnbrECKlVMZT0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77015 |
On 11/3/25 23:55, Robert Riches wrote: > On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: >> c186282 wrote: >> >>> On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >>>>> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >>>>> >>>>> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >>>>> >>>>> IMALENT MS32 >>>>> >>>>> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>>> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >>>>> >> tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd >>>> >>>> You can shorten that to: >>>> >>>> <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>> Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>> >>>> or even >>>> >>>> <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) >>>> >>>> Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long >>>> as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this >>>> profile. >>>> >>>> >>>> But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. >>> >>> >>> VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest >>> then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) >>> >>> The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. >>> >>>> I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create >>>> glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light >>>> source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it >>>> upwards, and use the reflection back. >>> >>> How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) >>> >>> Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use >>> where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside >>> your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera >>> flashbulbs ? >> >> Weren't they aluminum? > > If I understand the question correctly, flashLIGHTs (hand-held > devices that emit a continuous beam of light) were (mostly) > aluminum, while flashBULBs (very brief, small fraction of a > second, flash of light for photography) were magnesium. Found a reference ... see immediately previous post for this thread. Aluminum, magnesium and zirconium were all used - not sure which is 'better'. > Of course, there were other things one could do with a flashbulb. > A friend of mine used them for pranking coworkers, his son, etc. > I found some bulbs at a thrift store and gave them to him. He > grinned. :-) He would wire up a flashbulb inside his son's > desktop computer or under a circuit board at work. When the son > powered on the computer or the coworkers powered on the board, > the bright flash of light would cause the victim to think he had > just destroyed the machine or board in question. Funny !!! Older tech can have interesting uses. In any case, flashbulbs made a LOT of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 03:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <slrn10gli0d.4dl.spamtrap42@one.localnet> |
| In reply to | #77018 |
On 2025-11-04, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > On 11/3/25 23:55, Robert Riches wrote: >> On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: >>> c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> IMALENT MS32 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>>>> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >>>>>> >>> tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd >>>>> >>>>> You can shorten that to: >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>>> Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>>> >>>>> or even >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) >>>>> >>>>> Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long >>>>> as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this >>>>> profile. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. >>>> >>>> >>>> VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest >>>> then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) >>>> >>>> The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. >>>> >>>>> I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create >>>>> glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light >>>>> source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it >>>>> upwards, and use the reflection back. >>>> >>>> How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) >>>> >>>> Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use >>>> where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside >>>> your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera >>>> flashbulbs ? >>> >>> Weren't they aluminum? >> >> If I understand the question correctly, flashLIGHTs (hand-held >> devices that emit a continuous beam of light) were (mostly) >> aluminum, while flashBULBs (very brief, small fraction of a >> second, flash of light for photography) were magnesium. > > Found a reference ... see immediately previous post > for this thread. Aluminum, magnesium and zirconium > were all used - not sure which is 'better'. Thanks for that info and the reference in the earlier post. I had understood all the Mag-Lites I had ever seen (including a 4-D) were aluminum. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 01:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <Xu-cnYYZNNXedJf0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77031 |
On 11/4/25 22:44, Robert Riches wrote: > On 2025-11-04, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >> On 11/3/25 23:55, Robert Riches wrote: >>> On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: >>>> c186282 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/3/25 16:30, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-11-03 21:40, c186282 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/3/25 15:04, rbowman wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:05:43 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gosh. No idea that people were actually doing this. :-o >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.offgridweb.com/preparation/72000-lumen-diy-flashlight/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Found a 200,000 lumen flashlight on Amazon :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IMALENT MS32 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>>>>> Rechargeable/ dp/B0CRHRJWMC/ref=asc_df_B0CRHRJWMC? >>>>>>> >>>> tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608146994090&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=94237&hvtargid=pla-4584207611058171&psc=1&msclkid=845b880d8c6f10c0171ee1049eb7dafd >>>>>> >>>>>> You can shorten that to: >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/IMALENT-MS32-Flashlight-Flashlights- >>>>>> Rechargeable/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>>>> >>>>>> or even >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CRHRJWMC> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (note US links may not work in the UK/EU) >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, they work. But it may say not available to your country. As long >>>>>> as I don't change delivery address. I block Amazon cookies in this >>>>>> profile. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But that flashlight is amazing! And expensive. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> VERY expensive ... but if you just HAVE to own The Brightest >>>>> then, well, money won't stand it the way, hmm ? :-) >>>>> >>>>> The 100,000 luman mini version sells for half the price. >>>>> >>>>>> I don't think it is practical, though. That intense light will create >>>>>> glare to the user, you have to distance yourself from the light >>>>>> source, to another angle. In the videos, they have to point it >>>>>> upwards, and use the reflection back. >>>>> >>>>> How many lumens before you have a 'photonic weapon' ? :-) >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, at minimum, this would be for 'open field' use >>>>> where glare would be less of an issue. Turn it on inside >>>>> your house and, remember those old magnesium/O2 camera >>>>> flashbulbs ? >>>> >>>> Weren't they aluminum? >>> >>> If I understand the question correctly, flashLIGHTs (hand-held >>> devices that emit a continuous beam of light) were (mostly) >>> aluminum, while flashBULBs (very brief, small fraction of a >>> second, flash of light for photography) were magnesium. >> >> Found a reference ... see immediately previous post >> for this thread. Aluminum, magnesium and zirconium >> were all used - not sure which is 'better'. > > Thanks for that info and the reference in the earlier post. I > had understood all the Mag-Lites I had ever seen (including a > 4-D) were aluminum. Ummm ... THIS subject was olde-tyme camera FLASHBULBS. The MagLite's - the head-busting kind - are still all aluminum alloy. The new ones are now brighter LEDs, about 1000 lumens. They DO still sell a few 'classic' models, about 100 lumen filament bulbs. Check their site. CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind of power-control module too. Just leave the old ones alone, as 'backup' flashlights. Somewhere I have a 1500 lumen 'police' flash, but it's not as robust as the Mags. "Police", frankly you SHOULD be able to use it as a billy club too ... the 4/5/6D jobbies are perfect for that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 13:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <p0srtlxo9m.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #77032 |
On 2025-11-05 07:05, c186282 wrote: > On 11/4/25 22:44, Robert Riches wrote: >> On 2025-11-04, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >>> On 11/3/25 23:55, Robert Riches wrote: >>>> On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: >>>>> c186282 wrote: >>>>> ... >> Thanks for that info and the reference in the earlier post. I >> had understood all the Mag-Lites I had ever seen (including a >> 4-D) were aluminum. > > Ummm ... THIS subject was olde-tyme camera FLASHBULBS. > > The MagLite's - the head-busting kind - are still all > aluminum alloy. The new ones are now brighter LEDs, > about 1000 lumens. They DO still sell a few 'classic' > models, about 100 lumen filament bulbs. Check their site. > > CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. > Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind > of power-control module too. Just leave the old ones > alone, as 'backup' flashlights. Somewhere I have a > 1500 lumen 'police' flash, but it's not as robust as > the Mags. "Police", frankly you SHOULD be able to > use it as a billy club too ... the 4/5/6D jobbies > are perfect for that. They sell conversion kits. Basically replace the bulb part, done. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 22:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <SeycnTgagu6KjJH0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77038 |
On 11/5/25 07:20, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-05 07:05, c186282 wrote: >> On 11/4/25 22:44, Robert Riches wrote: >>> On 2025-11-04, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/3/25 23:55, Robert Riches wrote: >>>>> On 2025-11-04, Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote: >>>>>> c186282 wrote: >>>>>> > > ... > >>> Thanks for that info and the reference in the earlier post. I >>> had understood all the Mag-Lites I had ever seen (including a >>> 4-D) were aluminum. >> >> Ummm ... THIS subject was olde-tyme camera FLASHBULBS. >> >> The MagLite's - the head-busting kind - are still all >> aluminum alloy. The new ones are now brighter LEDs, >> about 1000 lumens. They DO still sell a few 'classic' >> models, about 100 lumen filament bulbs. Check their site. >> >> CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. >> Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind >> of power-control module too. Just leave the old ones >> alone, as 'backup' flashlights. Somewhere I have a >> 1500 lumen 'police' flash, but it's not as robust as >> the Mags. "Police", frankly you SHOULD be able to >> use it as a billy club too ... the 4/5/6D jobbies >> are perfect for that. > > > They sell conversion kits. Basically replace the bulb part, done. How many lumens ... and for HOW MUCH ? If the price is similar to an entire new flash then it's not worth it. Most of the drop-in upgrades I see on Amazon are about $19.95 and promise somewhere around 200 lumens ... but many can't deal with a 3+ cell light and there are restrictions depending on the exact socket type in the old flash. The ML300L 4D factory flash is $59.95 and offers 1000 lumens and two modes. One of the drop-in units may, or may not, be "worth it" depending on perspective. Also not sure how the beam focus setup works with the LEDs as compared to the filament bulbs. A huge wide beam isn't always what you need.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 16:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <mn1cjaF9s1jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #77032 |
On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:05:58 -0500, c186282 wrote: > CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. > Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind of power-control > module too. Just leave the old ones alone, as 'backup' flashlights. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PB44RLP It's not a huge improvement over the Krypton bulbs but it is a whiter light. It's a drop in replacement and probably will last longer for a couple of bucks more than the Krypton bulbs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 20:37 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <jllstlxsbp.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #77040 |
On 2025-11-05 17:33, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:05:58 -0500, c186282 wrote: > >> CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. >> Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind of power-control >> module too. Just leave the old ones alone, as 'backup' flashlights. > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PB44RLP > > It's not a huge improvement over the Krypton bulbs but it is a whiter > light. It's a drop in replacement and probably will last longer for a > couple of bucks more than the Krypton bulbs. > hardly an improvement. That lamp is heavy; I can carry in my pocket a little torch that gives more than that light output. I have no reason to carry around the old aluminum torch, with 4 big batteries, unless for self defence. For instance, this replacement bulb <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/148-8212-370-lumen-firefly-2-6-cell-led-conversion-for-maglite-cree-xhp35hi.html#/96-hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-no> Huh, no, only up to 325 Lumen (with 6 cell torch). This one: <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/107-8740-conversion-kit-for-maglite.html#/95-hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-yes_599/99-batteries-no/101-charger-no> produces 4200Lm on a 5-6 cell torch. The thing is, I have lost track of that torch. I thought it was useless, so it must be at the bottom of some old box. I can not play with it. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-05 22:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <SeycnTUagu7uiJH0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77042 |
On 11/5/25 14:37, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-05 17:33, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:05:58 -0500, c186282 wrote: >> >>> CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. >>> Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind of power- >>> control >>> module too. Just leave the old ones alone, as 'backup' flashlights. >> >> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PB44RLP >> >> It's not a huge improvement over the Krypton bulbs but it is a whiter >> light. It's a drop in replacement and probably will last longer for a >> couple of bucks more than the Krypton bulbs. >> > > hardly an improvement. That lamp is heavy; I can carry in my pocket a > little torch that gives more than that light output. I have no reason to > carry around the old aluminum torch, with 4 big batteries, unless for > self defence. > > > For instance, this replacement bulb > > <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/148-8212-370-lumen- > firefly-2-6-cell-led-conversion-for-maglite-cree-xhp35hi.html#/96- > hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-no> > > Huh, no, only up to 325 Lumen (with 6 cell torch). > > This one: <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/107-8740- > conversion-kit-for-maglite.html#/95- > hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-yes_599/99-batteries-no/101- > charger-no> produces 4200Lm on a 5-6 cell torch. > > The thing is, I have lost track of that torch. I thought it was useless, > so it must be at the bottom of some old box. I can not play with it. I have several of the "Mini-Mags" ... and they're damned good. The only reason you'd need much more would be for outdoors/camping purposes (and POLICE purposes of course). The 4/5/6D lights are excellent billy clubs too :-) Always use the one-shot lithiums in my lights ... unlike alkalines they don't go bad and the little extra power is another perk. Nobody in the USA seems to make 'C' or 'D' one-shot lithiums alas, so NiMH would be the possible backup but they DO go flat after awhile. However these days most of the smaller flashes use three or six 'AAA', on rare occasion 'AA' batteries. Oddly, my most-used flash is a $4.95 jobbie with a bunch of discrete LEDs instead of a module. It's bright and throws a broad enough beam to be very useful for finding things and working on things - not even TOO bad outdoors up to maybe 12 feet. So, you don't always need that $750 200,000 lumen jobbie to get good stuff done :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-06 11:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <dgbutlx72g.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #77055 |
On 2025-11-06 04:26, c186282 wrote: > On 11/5/25 14:37, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-11-05 17:33, rbowman wrote: >>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:05:58 -0500, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> CONVERTING an old one to LED ... probably NOT worth it. >>>> Gotta find/mount/cool the LED and you need some kind of power- >>>> control >>>> module too. Just leave the old ones alone, as 'backup' flashlights. >>> >>> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PB44RLP >>> >>> It's not a huge improvement over the Krypton bulbs but it is a whiter >>> light. It's a drop in replacement and probably will last longer for a >>> couple of bucks more than the Krypton bulbs. >>> >> >> hardly an improvement. That lamp is heavy; I can carry in my pocket a >> little torch that gives more than that light output. I have no reason >> to carry around the old aluminum torch, with 4 big batteries, unless >> for self defence. >> >> >> For instance, this replacement bulb >> >> <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/148-8212-370-lumen- >> firefly-2-6-cell-led-conversion-for-maglite-cree-xhp35hi.html#/96- >> hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-no> >> >> Huh, no, only up to 325 Lumen (with 6 cell torch). >> >> This one: <https://lumencraft.com/led-upgrades-for-maglite/107-8740- >> conversion-kit-for-maglite.html#/95- >> hardened_scratch_resistant_glass_lens-yes_599/99-batteries-no/101- >> charger-no> produces 4200Lm on a 5-6 cell torch. >> >> The thing is, I have lost track of that torch. I thought it was >> useless, so it must be at the bottom of some old box. I can not play >> with it. > > I have several of the "Mini-Mags" ... and they're > damned good. The only reason you'd need much more > would be for outdoors/camping purposes (and POLICE > purposes of course). > > The 4/5/6D lights are excellent billy clubs too :-) > > Always use the one-shot lithiums in my lights ... > unlike alkalines they don't go bad and the little > extra power is another perk. Nobody in the USA > seems to make 'C' or 'D' one-shot lithiums alas, > so NiMH would be the possible backup but they DO > go flat after awhile. However these days most of > the smaller flashes use three or six 'AAA', on > rare occasion 'AA' batteries. I don't like AAA lamps, the batteries are more expensive. > > Oddly, my most-used flash is a $4.95 jobbie with > a bunch of discrete LEDs instead of a module. It's > bright and throws a broad enough beam to be very > useful for finding things and working on things - > not even TOO bad outdoors up to maybe 12 feet. > > So, you don't always need that $750 200,000 lumen > jobbie to get good stuff done :-) On my shoulder bag I keep a small torch with just a single AA cell. Good enough for any emergencies like searching for dropped keys. On June 2021 I bought this one <https://www.amazon.es/dp/B08MC1K89D> which reaches 2000Lm. Then I misplaced it, so I bought <https://www.amazon.es/dp/B0DWSLVJG8> this July, which reaches 3000 Lm for short instants. Then this one broke down, so I bought another one at a physical shop, a Solognac BGS900M which reaches "only" 900Lm. And then I find the one I lost! Unfortunately, I have lost the battery holder/charger (thinking the torch was lost, I stored the spare battery and charger "securely". Don't remember where.). I can use it with 3 AAA cells, though. I complain at Amazon about the one that failed. The maker asks for a video showing the problem, and they are sending a replacement that should arrive tomorrow. So I end with three small but powerful torches. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-06 18:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <mn48h6FoqalU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #77065 |
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 11:56:45 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > I don't like AAA lamps, the batteries are more expensive. I've got enough AAA devices other than lamps that I keep a supply on hand. I also have AA, D, 9V, CR2032, and other common sizes. The odd one is C. I had one flashlight that used C. I did find sleeves that snap around an AA to make it the same dimension as a C. Obviously they don't last as long but it's convenient.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-06 17:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Flashlights |
| Message-ID | <gRydnZJtR77jvJD0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77072 |
On 11/6/25 13:42, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 11:56:45 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> I don't like AAA lamps, the batteries are more expensive. > > I've got enough AAA devices other than lamps that I keep a supply on hand. > I also have AA, D, 9V, CR2032, and other common sizes. The odd one is C. I > had one flashlight that used C. I did find sleeves that snap around an AA > to make it the same dimension as a C. Obviously they don't last as long > but it's convenient. Actually, 'C' flashlights are probably the most handy size - but you don't see many of them, indeed not many 'C' devices at all. Not sure why. Used to see a lot more. Once had a 'portable' reel-2-reel tape recorder (almost the size of a fire brick) and it used four 'C' cells. Worked well. MagLite DOES make some of the LED units in 'C' size however.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web