Scanner that works well with linux?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Scanner that works well with linux?
Date	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:36:42 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	10
Message-ID	<iphaad$k5f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6aXKh3LQY92sBI1xCW5dUA"; logging-data="20655"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3Do74xDmJWj5P0Mtf7OlKmGico5zWXXY="
User-Agent	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:xKdWQq+bP5wL5ILBrE3mrMojYFA=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:954

Show key headers only | View raw

I've tried several scanners with linux and have never found a 
software/hardware that works easily and well.  I have used xsane and it 
has so many options that it's virtually unusable, at least for me.  I 
have no idea what all of those terms mean.

I would like to scan a large number of old photos.  Does anyone have any 
idea on how I can do this.  Right now I have a Cannon flat bed scanner 
and a Lexmark Pinnacle Pro901 multifunction machine.

I would like to avoid using MS Windows if possible.  I rarely use it.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 08:36 -0700
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Douglas Mayne <none@invalid.com> - 2011-04-30 16:36 +0000
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-30 18:15 +0100
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 17:42 +0000
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-04-30 16:47 +0000
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 13:18 -0400
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 10:43 -0700
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:04 -0400
        Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-01 04:20 +0000
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2011-04-30 12:35 -0500
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 12:16 -0700
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:24 -0400
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:54 -0700
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:55 +0000
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:52 -0700
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-04-30 21:48 +0100
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 22:03 +0000
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? John Thompson <john@stolat.os2.dhs.org> - 2011-04-30 23:28 -0500
    Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-05-01 13:24 +0000
      Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-05-01 15:04 +0000
        Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-05-11 00:37 -0500
  Re: Scanner that works well with linux? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-05-01 06:43 -0500

csiph-web