Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #996
| From | A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Scanner that works well with linux? |
| Date | 2011-04-30 13:54 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iphsuc$84n$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <iphaad$k5f$1@dont-email.me> <iphn5m$hii$1@dont-email.me> <ic1v0jtue3.fsf@verizon.net> |
despen@verizon.net wrote: > A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> writes: > >> A Watcher wrote: >>> I've tried several scanners with linux and have never found a >>> software/hardware that works easily and well. I have used xsane and >>> it has so many options that it's virtually unusable, at least for >>> me. I have no idea what all of those terms mean. >>> >>> I would like to scan a large number of old photos. Does anyone have >>> any idea on how I can do this. Right now I have a Cannon flat bed >>> scanner and a Lexmark Pinnacle Pro901 multifunction machine. >>> >>> I would like to avoid using MS Windows if possible. I rarely use it. >> Thanks for all of the replies. I guess I wasn't very specific in >> describing my problems. Yes, I can get usable scanned images, but I >> spend a lot of time with xsane settings and then fiddling with GIMP to >> get files of a reasonable size that I can take to the store and have >> printed. >> >> My elderly mother recently passed away and I ended up with a large >> number of old photos and printed documents that I would like to scan >> and print and or email to family members. In order to get this done >> in a reasonable length of time I need to do it a lot faster than it >> has taken me in the past. > > Take a look at what I just posted. (scanimage). > > A command line tool will be the quickest way to go. > (It even has a "batch" option.) > > If you need help with the parameters someone here will probably help. Thanks
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 08:36 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Douglas Mayne <none@invalid.com> - 2011-04-30 16:36 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-30 18:15 +0100
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 17:42 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-04-30 16:47 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 13:18 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 10:43 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:04 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-01 04:20 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2011-04-30 12:35 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 12:16 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:24 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:54 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:55 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:52 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-04-30 21:48 +0100
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 22:03 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? John Thompson <john@stolat.os2.dhs.org> - 2011-04-30 23:28 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-05-01 13:24 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-05-01 15:04 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-05-11 00:37 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-05-01 06:43 -0500
csiph-web