Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1004
| From | notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Scanner that works well with linux? |
| Date | 2011-05-01 13:24 +0000 |
| Organization | ....little, if any |
| Message-ID | <92558mFai4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <iphaad$k5f$1@dont-email.me> <144v88-rkl2.ln1@os2.dhs.org> |
On 2011-05-01, John Thompson <john@stolat.os2.dhs.org> wrote: > I've always had good luck with Epson scanners in linux using sane/xsane. When I first got my Epson, sane did not have any drivers for it, so I hadda use an old W98 box. I finally found an iscan-proprietary-drivers rpm pkg and got it working on my Slackware box with xsane. Perhaps they got that straightened out, now. I remember my printer used to be a pain, too, but now takes less time/hassle to setup on a linux box than on a windows box. Linux jes keeps getting better. ;) nb
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 08:36 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Douglas Mayne <none@invalid.com> - 2011-04-30 16:36 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-30 18:15 +0100
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 17:42 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-04-30 16:47 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 13:18 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 10:43 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:04 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-01 04:20 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2011-04-30 12:35 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-04-30 19:02 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 12:16 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-30 15:24 -0400
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:54 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 19:55 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? A Watcher <stocksami@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-30 13:52 -0700
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-04-30 21:48 +0100
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-30 22:03 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? John Thompson <john@stolat.os2.dhs.org> - 2011-04-30 23:28 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-05-01 13:24 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-05-01 15:04 +0000
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-05-11 00:37 -0500
Re: Scanner that works well with linux? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-05-01 06:43 -0500
csiph-web