Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #10313
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | hwfwguy@gmail.com |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: GA144 Application Board |
| Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:46 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 28 |
| Message-ID | <6671227.141.1332444346642.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjx8> (permalink) |
| References | <49556347-7bf6-494b-92be-f7c8aff18880@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <7xvcm6o9qi.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <0d702ca7-8af4-4b99-8d12-1320b239d2be@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> <m18khv.6fd@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <5eb4fce2-726b-4dfe-b699-8c1c592294b6@hv2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 74.202.4.125 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1332444346 7690 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2012 19:25:46 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:25:46 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <5eb4fce2-726b-4dfe-b699-8c1c592294b6@hv2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=74.202.4.125; posting-account=6GCGIQoAAAAyO8IjR_VTwqiqLwx0Q_G8 |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2914 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:10313 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:13:23 PM UTC-7, rickman wrote: > I read that someone at GA (may have been Chuck) had a 10 MHz crystal > ringing in the lab, but it was far from what I would consider a > crystal oscillator. I think it might be practical to get a 32 kHz > crystal to resonate, but I think MHz frequencies are just too high to > be practical. When I tried to discuss this in a non-forth forum some > real experts in oscillators didn't even know how to approach it. In > other words, no one knew how to analyze it. So how could the > stability and operation over temperature, etc be predicted? I looked at this once and decided the I/O structure wasn't really sufficient to run a crystal oscillator with one pin. The problem is that you need to bias the pin near its switching point to decide which side of the voltage swing you're on. Maybe a node could be programmed as an inverter with two pins and you'd have a feedback resistor like a typical oscillator. > > Isn't 4 GB a bit much? PDA's, tablets and cell phones don't have that > much memory! Geeze, this PC I am typing on only has 4 GB!!! The idea > of scrounging PC's at the dump for memory is a bit funny. I think a > $4 SRAM or SDRAM chip will do the job ok. > Mobile SDR SDRAM would be easiest to use. Not DDR2 or DDR3. There is no PLL in the SDR parts so the clock doesn't have to be a fixed period, or any minimum period as long as times are met. These parts don't have the PC market pushing down their prices, but they will be around for a long time. They also come in small sizes like 16Mb (2M byte).
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-10 17:24 -0800
Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 10:10 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 04:33 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board emmanuel <emmanuel.said@cern.ch> - 2012-03-11 06:00 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 19:41 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 16:03 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 13:45 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2012-03-11 12:33 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Matthias Koch <koch@pci.uni-hannover.de> - 2012-03-15 14:11 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-14 19:53 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-20 20:15 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-21 13:08 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 12:13 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 11:36 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 17:50 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:50 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:24 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:11 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Roger Ivie <rivie@ridgenet.net> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0500
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:51 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-25 12:06 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 12:50 -0700
GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-26 13:00 +0000
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 20:03 -0700
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-28 12:21 +0000
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-28 07:59 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:26 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-03-22 12:25 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 13:07 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:54 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:15 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-23 17:32 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 12:01 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Jan Coombs <jan_2011-02@murray-microft.co.uk> - 2012-03-24 22:27 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:13 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-24 16:01 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:18 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 13:06 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 15:02 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 15:51 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 16:38 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 16:54 -0500
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:17 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:52 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:34 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:24 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 14:22 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:12 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:38 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:52 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 20:17 -0500
Re: Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:29 -0700
csiph-web