Re: Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board]

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board]
Date	2012-03-23 10:29 -0700
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<5972d734-065c-4e6f-9dbe-a80ffaa8ac5c@w1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	<49556347-7bf6-494b-92be-f7c8aff18880@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <7aedndzmQYWKUvbSnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, Richard Owlett <rowl...@pcnetinc.com> wrote:
> rickman wrote:
> > What would you like to see on a GA144 application board?  I am
> > thinking of building a board which would have enough buffered analog
> > input and output for the 5 ADC and DAC I/Os as well as buffered I/O
> > for a number of digital I/Os, around 8 to 12 each. ...
>
> > [*LARGE* snip]
>
> I've been lightly following this thread. I don't believe the
> GA144 is "aimed at"/"suitable for" problems I'm currently
> interested in. I also do not claim the programming expertise
> to address the problem of moving data and/or calculations
> between cores/nodes/???.
>
> Physical hardware, much more fascinating ;)
> I suspect that are not only the "wrong" questions being
> asked, but assumptions  might also be "wrong". N.B. generous
> use of "..." .
>
> Dubious assumptions:
> - homogeneity of c.l.f.
> SECT1   - immediate high volume use - 1000's per ???
> SECT1a  - immediate      volume use - 100's  per  ??/N
> SECT2   - immediate low  volume use - semi/full custom apps
> SECT3a  - near future use for semi/full custom apps
> SECT3b1 - experimenter use
> SECT3b2 - Hobbyist
> - even when above (& other) differences are recognized
> the initial needs of all groups (AND sub-groups) are very
> similar (~==)
>
> A proposed (possibly naive) solution _framework_
> - CPU card with
>    RAM
>    ROM &/or PROM
>    unity gain analog buffers
>     {before some squawk - open traces which can be closed
> are tradition ;)
> - I/O card (w buffers)
> - Memory card (ROM RAM OTHER{why might a TB drive not be
> memory???)
> - Analog I/O card (Think before complaining - I'm proposing
> a philosophy NOT an implementation ;/


I'm not sure what to say about your post.  Most of it is sentence
fragments and does not really convey your intention so I can
understand it.

What are you trying to say?

Rick

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-10 17:24 -0800
  Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 10:10 +0100
    Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 04:33 -0700
      Re: GA144 Application Board emmanuel <emmanuel.said@cern.ch> - 2012-03-11 06:00 -0700
        Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 19:41 -0700
      Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 16:03 +0100
        Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 13:45 -0700
  Re: GA144 Application Board Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2012-03-11 12:33 -0700
  Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-11 19:45 +0000
    Re: GA144 Application Board Matthias Koch <koch@pci.uni-hannover.de> - 2012-03-15 14:11 +0100
  Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-14 19:53 -0700
    Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-20 20:15 -0700
      Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-21 13:08 +0000
        Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 12:13 -0700
          Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 11:36 +0000
            Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 17:50 +0000
              Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:50 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:24 +0000
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:11 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Roger Ivie <rivie@ridgenet.net> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0500
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:51 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-25 12:06 +0000
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 12:50 -0700
                GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-26 13:00 +0000
                Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 20:03 -0700
                Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-28 12:21 +0000
                Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-28 07:59 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:26 -0700
          Re: GA144 Application Board hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-03-22 12:25 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 13:07 -0700
              Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:54 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:15 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-23 17:32 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 12:01 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Jan Coombs <jan_2011-02@murray-microft.co.uk> - 2012-03-24 22:27 +0000
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:13 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-24 16:01 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:18 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 13:06 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 15:02 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 15:51 -0700
                Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 16:38 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 16:54 -0500
              Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:17 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:52 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:34 +0000
              Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:24 -0700
            Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 14:22 +0000
      Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:12 -0700
        Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:38 +0000
      Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:52 -0700
        Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
  Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 20:17 -0500
    Re: Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:29 -0700

csiph-web