Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #10446
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| From | Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
| Subject | Re: GA144 Application Board |
| Date | 2012-03-25 12:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m1fwbk.jty@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> (permalink) |
| Organization | Dutch Forth Workshop |
| References | <49556347-7bf6-494b-92be-f7c8aff18880@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <b03c08a8-1606-48c5-8108-68f799db57f8@j14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <slrnjmpfdp.ri8.rivie@stench.no.domain> <29c5b9f9-65da-44ed-aacb-0baaa9130e72@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
In article <29c5b9f9-65da-44ed-aacb-0baaa9130e72@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 23, 2:15=A0pm, Roger Ivie <ri...@ridgenet.net> wrote: >> On 2012-03-23, rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Farnell is EU and I am USA. =A0We hae Digikey and Mouser, both with goo= >d >> > parts search engines. =A0I prefer Digikey and have a company account, >> > never a delivery problem. =A0In fact, I've discovered that US Mail >> > Priority mail is faster for me than UPS and cheaper too! >> >> The US outlet of Farnell is Newark. I only know this because of >> the recent Raspberry Pi hoopla. >> >> It looks to me like there were a couple of typos in the part number; >> near as I can tell, the part number should have actually been >> H5PS1G63EFR instead of HSPS1G3EFR. The Newark page is here: >> >> http://www.newark.com/hynix-semiconductor/h5ps1g63efr-s6c/sdram-ddr2-... >> >> -- >> roger ivie >> ri...@ridgenet.net > >Thanks for the clarification. > >This is a DDR2 device using SSTL logic level interfaces, not supported >by the GA144. I am not interested in analyzing this with the GA144 to >see if it can be kludged. I don't think the GA144 data sheet provides >enough info. I'll take a look at SDRAM and DDR when I get a chance. I don't know what SSTL is. I surely don't want interfaces. I expect that a 2.5 V chip can be connected directly to the GA144. We are not talking ECL here! I'm sure that a 1.8 V chip can be connected directly to the GA144. I have found several. It is you who insists on talking about DDR2 devices. I'm talking about loose chips that are present on memory expansion cards. I read the specs of the chips. That is why I'm talking about CAS and RAS instead of DDR2 and such. > >Rick Groetjes Albert -- -- Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters. albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-10 17:24 -0800
Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 10:10 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 04:33 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board emmanuel <emmanuel.said@cern.ch> - 2012-03-11 06:00 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 19:41 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Rafael Deliano <Rafael_Deliano@arcor.de> - 2012-03-11 16:03 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 13:45 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2012-03-11 12:33 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Matthias Koch <koch@pci.uni-hannover.de> - 2012-03-15 14:11 +0100
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-14 19:53 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-20 20:15 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-21 13:08 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 12:13 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 11:36 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-22 17:50 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:50 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:24 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:11 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Roger Ivie <rivie@ridgenet.net> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0500
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:51 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-25 12:06 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 12:50 -0700
GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-26 13:00 +0000
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 20:03 -0700
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-28 12:21 +0000
Re: GA144 memory interfacing was Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-28 07:59 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:26 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-03-22 12:25 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 13:07 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:54 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:15 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-23 17:32 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 12:01 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Jan Coombs <jan_2011-02@murray-microft.co.uk> - 2012-03-24 22:27 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:13 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-24 16:01 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:18 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 13:06 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 15:02 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 15:51 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 16:38 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 16:54 -0500
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:17 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 14:52 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:34 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:24 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 14:22 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:12 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-23 12:38 +0000
Re: GA144 Application Board Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-22 08:52 -0700
Re: GA144 Application Board rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-22 15:00 -0700
Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-03-22 20:17 -0500
Re: Time to revisit S100 Bus? - was [Re: GA144 Application Board] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:29 -0700
csiph-web