Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59479

Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13

From maximilian attems <maks@stro.at>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13
Date 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <uP1LB-79Z-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uP037-64b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mu-6pO-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:18:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest
> > linux packages?
> 
> This is in response to a discussion that happened on this list. The
> thread started in august last year[1], but really picked up speed last
> month[2] and this one[3].
> 
> The idea is that, if no critical issues are found, buster would release
> with AppArmor enabled by default. If critical issues are found, however,
> I expect the decision will be reversed (or at the least, postponed).
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00090.html
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/threads.html#00086
> [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/threads.html#00000
> 

This doesn't strike me as a discussion, but looks more like a predetermined setup.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
  Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
      Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
        Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
          Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
            Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
              Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
  Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
      Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100

csiph-web