Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59474
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 |
| Date | 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uP0mt-6pO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uP037-64b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0cO-67h-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mt-6pO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:55:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > AppArmor is the default LSM. > > There is no such thing as a default LSM in Linux. $ grep DEFAULT_SECURITY /boot/config-4.13.0-1-amd64 # CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR=y # CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY="apparmor" > > > The changelog suggests it was done that systemd units might use it, > > > but in that case those systemd units should depend on apparmor. > > > > They don't depend on AppArmor unless it's enabled. Which is a decision > > made in the kernel configuration (potentially overriden by the kernel > > comamnd line). > > So we should not need the recommends. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100
csiph-web