Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59473
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 |
| Date | 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uP0cO-67h-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uP037-64b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:18 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest > linux packages? apparomor is just one of many security modules, and > a fairly bogus one to start with. The kernel should not recommend it > as it doesn't add at all to the expected kernel functionality. AppArmor is the default LSM. > The changelog suggests it was done that systemd units might use it, > but in that case those systemd units should depend on apparmor. They don't depend on AppArmor unless it's enabled. Which is a decision made in the kernel configuration (potentially overriden by the kernel comamnd line). Ben. > And to start with there probably should be a policty that no unit > file shall fail the boot for a missing security module (any of them). -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100
csiph-web