Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59505
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 |
| Date | 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uQTAe-74X-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <uP0cO-67h-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mt-6pO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mt-6pO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0wa-6t4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP1iy-70e-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:43:10PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > do you think you could manage to either point the general -devel > reading population to a discussion of why using AppArmor by default is > horrible news, or write that yourself? That would seem to be more > constructive than you just showing up after months of discussion > saying it's horrible news. It's just a bad idea of a security model that implements ad-hoc and mostly path based restrictions instead of an actually verified security model. Using that by default makes it much harder to actually use a real MAC based security model, which not only is required for various security sensitive deployments but also a good idea in general. Last but not least apparmor had various issues where certain distros shipped non-upstream features that later turned out to be incompatible with what went upstream.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100
csiph-web