Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59479
| From | maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 |
| Date | 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uP1LB-79Z-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uP037-64b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mu-6pO-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:18:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest > > linux packages? > > This is in response to a discussion that happened on this list. The > thread started in august last year[1], but really picked up speed last > month[2] and this one[3]. > > The idea is that, if no critical issues are found, buster would release > with AppArmor enabled by default. If critical issues are found, however, > I expect the decision will be reversed (or at the least, postponed). > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00090.html > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/threads.html#00086 > [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/threads.html#00000 > This doesn't strike me as a discussion, but looks more like a predetermined setup.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100
csiph-web