Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13

From	Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel
Subject	Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13
Date	2017-11-23 18:30 +0100
Message-ID	<uP3u2-8hk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uP037-64b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP0mu-6pO-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <uP1LB-79Z-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

maximilian attems writes ("Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13"):
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00090.html
> > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/threads.html#00086
> > [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/threads.html#00000
> 
> This doesn't strike me as a discussion, but looks more like a predetermined setup.

The reason it doesn't look very discussion-ish is that no-one replied
to explain why the proposed approach was a bad idea.  So there was a
bit of discussion of details, but general agreement.  That's how
consensus works.

The tenor of the mails was very good and clearly invited discussion
and dissent.  Nevertheless, if you can explain now why it's a bad
idea, please do so.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 14:50 +0100
  Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:00 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
      Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
        Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-11-23 16:10 +0100
          Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-28 20:20 +0100
            Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) - 2017-11-29 00:50 +0100
              Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-11-23 15:20 +0100
  Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-11-23 15:10 +0100
    Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2017-11-23 16:40 +0100
      Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 18:30 +0100

csiph-web