Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14728

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

From Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?
Date 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <FCY1X-aR0U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FC0Sf-agdq-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FC9C9-alMw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCaeR-alZR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/13/22 10:57, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
> Am 13.12.2022 10:15 schrieb Timo Röhling:
>> One remaining problem is the unmaintained nose package
>> [...]
>> done some work patching up nose
> 
> This question is just for my learning: Why is nose patched? Upstream 
> nose is unmaintained for years.
> 
> I understand that you cannot drop nose from Debian in the current 
> situation of a freeze in one months and so many dependencies.
> 
> But isn't there a Debian process/workflow to "warn" package maintainers 
> about an upcoming package drop of one of there dependend packages to put 
> some pressure into it? Looking into the list of over 200 packages I see 
> this also as a chance to clean out some other unmaintained (and maybe 
> not so important) packages from the Debian repo.

It's unfortunately sometimes a bit harder than what one may think. 
Removing Nose from (build-)depends in some cases is hard, and IMO we 
started this process a way too late. Hopefully, Trixie will be 
nose-free! In the mean time, it is unfortunately my opinion that it's 
too late for Bookworm and that we must keep Nose for one more release.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100

csiph-web