Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14729

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

From Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?
Date 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
Message-ID <FCYbD-aR45-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FC0Sf-agdq-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCcJI-anCR-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/13/22 13:34, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:51:11PM +0000, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> Dear Python Team
>>
>> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
>> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
>> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied
>> below for reference.
>> [...]
> 
> If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder
> will not be included: debugpy, which is a dependency of Spyder and
> python3-ipykernel (and lots of things that depend on that) seems to
> require major work upstream to make it fully compatible with Python
> 3.11.  This is work in progress, but I don't know whether it will be
> ready in time for the freeze.  At the moment, I have worked around
> this problem by just skipping the failing tests, but that is far from
> an ideal solution.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
>     Julian

Hi Julian,

It's probably ok if it's a *TEMPORARY* solution until upstream fixes 
everything in time for the release (which is months after the freeze). 
The question is: do you believe this may happen for let's say next March?

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100

csiph-web