Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14729
| From | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? |
| Date | 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FCYbD-aR45-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FC0Sf-agdq-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCcJI-anCR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
On 12/13/22 13:34, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Graham, > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:51:11PM +0000, Graham Inggs wrote: >> Dear Python Team >> >> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported >> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages >> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied >> below for reference. >> [...] > > If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder > will not be included: debugpy, which is a dependency of Spyder and > python3-ipykernel (and lots of things that depend on that) seems to > require major work upstream to make it fully compatible with Python > 3.11. This is work in progress, but I don't know whether it will be > ready in time for the freeze. At the moment, I have worked around > this problem by just skipping the failing tests, but that is far from > an ideal solution. > > Best wishes, > > Julian Hi Julian, It's probably ok if it's a *TEMPORARY* solution until upstream fixes everything in time for the release (which is months after the freeze). The question is: do you believe this may happen for let's say next March? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100
csiph-web