Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14224
| From | Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? |
| Date | 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EGFvX-9Ozm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDlap-7OvH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian Project |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, 在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400,Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道: > On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is > > there > > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, > > what > > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Boyuan Yang > > > > > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 > > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517 > > Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the > "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and > let people know they can migrate to it. This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 . Cheers, Boyuan Yang
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200
csiph-web