Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14224

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

From Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
Message-ID <EGFvX-9Ozm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDlap-7OvH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian Project

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400,Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道:
> On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
> > 
> > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is
> > there
> > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
> > what
> > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Boyuan Yang
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517
> > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517
> 
> Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the
> "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and
> let people know they can migrate to it.

This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 .

Cheers,
Boyuan Yang

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web